Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: LARRY PLUMBING COMPANY

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of LARRY PLUMBING COMPANY in 100 INDUSTRIAL BLVD, EULESS, TX 76040 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 345635163.

Watch Larry Plumbing Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Larry Plumbing Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
100 INDUSTRIAL BLVD
City
EULESS
State
TX
ZIP
76040
Mailing
518 JOHNSON RD., DUNCANVILLE, TX 75116
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238220
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1755.00 · Current $1053.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1153(c)(1): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section.   On the west side of the construction site, the employer did not ensure the employees using a DeWalt and HILITI jackhammers to install a trench in the concrete slab floor was protected from being expose to silica with the use of engineering controls, work practices and respiratory protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1053
  • — Z (S) $1755

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:   On the west side of the construction site, the employer did not access and protect employees from potential exposure from silica while jackhammering with a DeWalt and HILTI jackhammers exposing the employees to silica dust from the concrete slab.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.101 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $279.00 · Current $167.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.101(a):Ear protective devices were not provided and/or were not used when it was not feasible to reduce noise levels or duration of exposures to those specified in Table D-2, Permissible Noise Exposure, in 29 CFR 1926.52.    On the west side of the construction site, employees engaged in jackhammering work without wearing hearing protection were exposed to noise hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $167.4
  • — Z (O) $279

1926.102 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $329.00 · Current $197.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee was using eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.   On the west side of the construction site, employees engaged in jackhammering work without wearing safety glasses were exposed to struck-by hazards from flying debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $197.4
  • — Z (O) $329

RNWBL

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345635163.