Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MARTIN VARGAS BRAVO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARTIN VARGAS BRAVO in 8081 MINNOW TRAIL, LOT 53, PICKERINGTON, OH 43147 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346679749.

Watch Martin Vargas Bravo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Martin Vargas Bravo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARTIN VARGAS BRAVO
Site address
8081 MINNOW TRAIL, LOT 53
City
PICKERINGTON
State
OH
ZIP
43147
Mailing
842 JOYFUL STREET, COLUMBUS, OH 43204
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a. Location at Estates at Lake Forest at 8053 Minnow Trails, Pickerington Ohio, lot 53: On or about May 04, 2023, an employee was operating a pneumatic nail gun to install roof shingles on the residential two story single family home without wearing any type of eye protection. Thereby exposing the employee to struck by hazards to the eyes and face.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. Location at The Estates at Lake Forest at 8053 Minnow Trails, Pickerington Ohio, lot 53: On or about May 04, 2023, two employees were performing roofing work on a two-story residential home without any type of fall protection in place. Thereby exposed these employees to falls of up to approximately 11 feet 2 inches to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

LIPPERT

PROVIA

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346679749.