1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: TITAN INDUSTRIES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TITAN INDUSTRIES, INC. in 300 NORTH MAIN STREET, MACKINAW, IL 61755 (NAICS 331210). OSHA activity number 346900921.

Watch Titan Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Titan Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
300 NORTH MAIN STREET
City
MACKINAW
State
IL
ZIP
61755
Mailing
300 NORTH MAIN STREET, MACKINAW, IL 61755
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331210
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B05 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6250.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i):  There were no visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices installed in paint spray booths to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained:  On or about August 10, 2023, the employer had not ensured:  a. the spray booth located on the northwest side of the facility had a functioning manometer. b. the powder coating booths located on the southwest corner of the facility had functioning manometers.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6250
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.134 D01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6250.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i):  Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability:  On or about August 10, 2023, employees working in the spray booth area were required to wear tight-fitting respirators and the employer had not ensured appropriate respiratory protection was based on the respiratory hazards which the employees were exposed.  Employees were wearing 3M half-mask respirators with P100 HEPA particulate filters during spray painting operations.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6250
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 24402590V109

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about August 10, 2023, the employer had not provided a medical evaluation to determine each employee's ability to use a tight-fitting half mask respirator before requiring its use.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 24402590V109

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  On or about August 10, 2023, employees were required to wear tight-fitting respirators and the employer had not provided fit testing.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 24402590V109

29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  On or about August 10, 2023, employees were required to wear tight-fitting respirators and the employer had not provided training and information that included the following:    a. why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator,  b. what limitations and capabilities of the respirator are,  c. how to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions,  d. how to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator,  e. what the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator,  f. how to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirator. g. the general requirements of this section.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View TITAN INDUSTRIES, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346900921.