Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: NEW FEDCO GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of NEW FEDCO GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP. in 644 WEST PUTNAM DRIVE, GREENWICH, CT 06830 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 347494874.

Watch NEW Fedco General Construction Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for NEW Fedco General Construction Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
644 WEST PUTNAM DRIVE
City
GREENWICH
State
CT
ZIP
06830
Mailing
1277 D BURKE AVE, BRONX, NY 10469
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $438.00 · Current $438.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   Location:  644 West Putnam Drive, Greenwich, Connecticut  Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 01; Citation 001, Item 02; Citation 001, Item 03 and Citation 001, Item 04 with a final order date of 12/31/2024 was not received within 10 calendar days (by 01/07/2025) following the abatement due date (12/27/2024).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $438

1926.55 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5323.00 · Current $5323.00

Hazardous substances C730

29 CFR  1926.55(a)(2): An employee(s) was exposed to substance(s) with a permissible exposure limit not preceded by (C) at concentrations above that specified in Table 1 of �1926.55 for that substance(s):  644 West Putnam Avenue, Bridgeport CT: On or about May 21, 2024, one employee was using a gas powered hand saw when he was exposed to carbon monoxide at concentrations in excess of the 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 parts per million (ppm). The gasoline-powered saw was used in an enclosed space which allowed the exhaust gases to accumulate.  One employee had been exposed to carbon monoxide at an 8-hour TWA of  92.4 ppm which is 1.85 times the PEL. The exposure concentration was derived by entering the employee's carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) concentration and other data into the Coburn-Forster-Kane equation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5323

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1.  644 West Putnam Avenue, Greenwich CT: On or about May 21, 2024, the employer did not ensure the worker was protected from exposure to respirable crystalline silica through the use of the proper engineering controls and respiratory protection during tasks such as (but not limited to) saw-cutting concrete without the use of the integrated water delivery system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1153 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:   644 West Putnam Avenue, Greenwich CT: On or about May 21, 2024, the employer did not implement an exposure control plan for the employee exposed to respirable crystalline silica during tasks such as (but not limited to) saw-cutting concrete without the use of the integrated water delivery system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1153 I02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(i)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that employees covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of at least the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1926(i)(2)(i)(A) through (F) where there was exposure to respirable crystalline silica:   644 West Putnam Avenue, Greenwich CT: On or about May 21, 2024, the employer did not provide training in the: (1) health hazards of silica exposure, (2) tasks involving silica exposure, (3) engineering controls and respiratory protection necessary, and (4) contents of the OSHA silica standard for the employee exposed to respirable crystalline silica during tasks such as (but not limited to) saw-cutting concrete without the use of the integrated water delivery system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347494874.