Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ERVIN GOMEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ERVIN GOMEZ in 1881 2ND AVE, BUILDING A: LOTS 101, 102, AND 103 AND BUILDING C: LOT 114. VELA PARK SUBDIVISION, DECATUR, GA 30032 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 347882565.

Watch Ervin Gomez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ervin Gomez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ERVIN GOMEZ
Site address
1881 2ND AVE, BUILDING A: LOTS 101, 102, AND 103 AND BUILDING C: LOT 114. VELA PARK SUBDIVISION
City
DECATUR
State
GA
ZIP
30032
Mailing
804 WYNHOLLOW TRACE APT 3, NORCROSS, GA 30071
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2074.00 · Current $2074.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  a) On or about November 13, 2024, the employer exposed employees engaged in framing activities to struck-by hazards, in that head protection was not provided to employees working under overhead hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2074

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2074.00 · Current $2074.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a)Top plate, first and second level: On or about November 13, 2024, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards, in that protective eyewear was not provided to employees while operating nail guns at 125 PSI, hand-held circular saws and reciprocating saws, while engaged in framing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2074

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   a)Top plate: On or about November 13, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 21 feet to the lower level, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees engaged in framing activities using the top plate as a walking/working surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.602 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2765.00 · Current $2765.00
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l):Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under paragraph (d) of this section are identical to those set forth at paragraph (l) of 29 CFR 1910.178:  a) On or about November 13, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees engaged in framing activities to struck-by hazards, in that the operator of a rough terrain forklift did not receive training and certification to operate the forklift truck.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2765

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2765.00 · Current $2765.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a) On or about November 13, 2024, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that employees were utilizing an extension ladder to access the upper level that did not extend at least 3-feet past the landing which measured at approximately 12-feet, 6-inches to the lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2765

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:  a) Building C, Lot 114: On or about November 13, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that employees engaged in framing activities were utilizing the top two rungs of a 6-feet A-frame ladder while using a nail gun.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View ERVIN GOMEZ's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347882565.