OSHA Inspection: JUAN MARTINEZ

Issued

2025-09-19 00:00:00

Abate by

2025-10-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  a. On or about May 7, 2025,  Employees doing framing work and were exposed to head injuries where overhead hazard exists by not wearing hard hats.

Issued

2025-09-19 00:00:00

Abate by

2025-10-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a. On or about May 7, 2025, employees were doing framing work and were exposed to eye injuries by not wearing eye protection while using a  Makita and DeWalt circular saws.

Issued

2025-09-19 00:00:00

Abate by

2025-10-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a. On or about May 7, 2025, 2 employees engaged in framing work without fall protection were exposed to unprotected fall hazards of approximately 19-feet to the ground below

Issued

2025-09-19 00:00:00

Abate by

2025-10-16 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1051(a):Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:  a. On or about May 7, 2025, The employer did not provide an extension ladder where employee(s) could access and egress the residential building second level, exposing them to potential fall hazard(s).