CONCORD, NH —
OSHA Inspection: LOYAL CONSTRUCTION INC
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of LOYAL CONSTRUCTION INC in 15 SUFFOLK DRIVE, CONCORD, NH 03303 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348274259.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LOYAL CONSTRUCTION INC
- Site address
- 15 SUFFOLK DRIVE
- City
- CONCORD
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03303
- Mailing
- 1186 WORCESTER ROAD UNIT 531, FRAMINGHAM, MA 01702
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4965.00 · Current $4000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Site- Employees installing roof sheathing were not protected from falls between approximately 16 feet to the ground and 8 feet to the second floor where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.502 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(1): The top edge height of the top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, was not 42 inches (1.1 m) plus or minus 3 inches (8 cm) above the walking/working level: Site- Employees working near second floor window openings were not protected from a fall of approximately 9 feet where the bottom sills of the window openings were 22 inches from the floor and no top rail was installed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3547.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Site- Employees working at the site were exposed to fall, struck by, trip, and powered industrial truck hazards where the employer did provide for frequent and regular inspections of the worksite conducted by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Site- Employees exposed to fall hazards were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3547.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agent: Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns and circular saws were not protected for eye injuries where eye protection was not worn.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.602 C01 VI
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3547.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi): Industrial truck(s) in use did not meet the applicable requirements of design, construction, stability, inspection, testing, maintenance, and operation, as defined in American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks. Site- Employees were not protected from struck by and crushing hazards where the CAT TL943 all-terrain forklift in use had a load of plywood elevated to the roof and the all-terrain forklift was left unattended by the employer, which is prohibited by ANSI B56.1-1969.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.602 D
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l): Site- Employees were not protected from struck by and crushing hazards where the employee operating the CAT TL943 all-terrain forklift that was was not provided with operator training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: Site- Employees using aluminum extension ladders to access the roof from the ground were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladders only extended one rung above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1052 C01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail: Site- Employees were not protected from trip hazards where the stairways inside each unit, from the first floor to the second floor, did not have handrails.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: Site- Employees climbing the second floor wall framing to gain access to the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where a ladder was not provided to access the roof from the second floor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at LOYAL CONSTRUCTION INC
WELLESLEY, MA—2026-03-11
LOYAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
LEXINGTON, MA—2025-12-11
LOYAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
THORNTON, CO—2024-09-03 00:00:00
LOYAL CONSTRUCTION INC.
THORNTON, CO—2024-09-03 00:00:00
LOYAL CONSTRUCTION INC.
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO—2020-10-15 00:00:00
LOYAL CONSTRUCTION INC.
View LOYAL CONSTRUCTION INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
FAIRHOPE, AL—2026-07-16
FRANCISCO ARES
WOODHAVEN, MI—2026-07-16
G.J. PERELLI CO., L.L.C.
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
BERLIN, NJ—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-15
TRIPLE R CONSTRUCTION LLC
More inspections in NH
PORTSMOUTH, NH—2026-07-15
RODAS CONSTRUCTION CORP
DOVER, NH—2026-07-15
KNOX MARSH DEVELOPMENT LLC
DOVER, NH—2026-07-15
REAL PRO BUILDERS CONSTRUCTION INC
MERRIMACK, NH—2026-07-15
BURGER KING
MILFORD, NH—2026-07-15
R G EXTERIORS, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348274259.