Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: PREMIER LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PREMIER LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC in 1 ANN AND HOPE WAY, CUMBERLAND, RI 02864 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 348296575.

Watch Premier Land Development, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Premier Land Development, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1 ANN AND HOPE WAY
City
CUMBERLAND
State
RI
ZIP
02864
Mailing
56 PINE STREET SUITE 3A, PROVIDENCE, RI 02903
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1116.00 · Current $1116.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated.  (a) Establishment:  As of January 30, 2026, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement had been completed for Citations 1-1a, 1-1b, 1-1c, 1-1d, 1-1e, 1-2, 2-1, 2-2 and 2-3b from inspection number 1829657, issued on 8/29/2025, with a final order date of 11/13/2025.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $1116

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  (a) Establishment:  As of January 30, 2026, the employer had not provided the required abatement documentation to OSHA for Citations 1-1a, 1-1b, 1-1c, 1-1d, 1-1e, 1-2, 2-1, 2-2 and 2-3b from inspection number 1829657, issued on 8/29/2025, with a final order date of 11/13/2025.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $7944.00 · Current $7944.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use. (Construction Reference 1926.103)  a) Jobsite: On or about June 9, 2025, the employer did not establish and implement an adequate written respiratory protection program, where respirator use was required.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $7944

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. (Construction Reference 1926.103)  a) Jobsite: On or about June 9, 2025, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine an employee's ability to use a respirator prior to requiring its use.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT). (Construction Reference 1926.103)  a) Jobsite: On or about June 9, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees were fit-tested when required to use N95 respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function.  (Construction Reference 1926.103)   a) Jobsite: On or about June 9, 2025, the employer allowed an employee with facial hair to wear a tight-fitting respirator, that interfered with the seal.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary. (Construction Reference 1926.103)   a) Jobsite: On or about June 9, 2025, the employer did not provide respiratory protection training to employees on the use and care of respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B04 II

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5958.00 · Current $5958.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(ii): Each employee on a walking/working surface was not protected from tripping in or stepping into or through holes (including skylights) by covers.  a) Near front corner: On or about June 9, 2025, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from tripping over or falling into a partially covered hole.  b) End of brick wall near door frame: On or about June 9, 2025, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from tripping over or into an open floor hole.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5958

1904.33 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1986.00 · Current $1986.00
29 CFR 1904.33(a): The employer did not save the OSHA 300 Log, the privacy case list (if one existed), the annual summary, and the OSHA 301 Incident Report Forms for five (5) years following the end of the calendar year that these records covered.   a) Jobsite: On or about June 9, 2025, the employer did not retain the OSHA 300 logs, the annual summary, and the OSHA 301's for the past five years.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $1986

1904.41 A01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1986.00 · Current $1986.00
29CFR 1904.41(a)(1)(i): If your establishment had 20-249 employees at any time during the previous calendar year, and your establishment is classified in an industry listed in appendix A to subpart E of this part, then you must electronically submit information from OSHA Form 300A Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses to OSHA or OSHA's designee. You must submit the information once a year, no later than the date listed in paragraph (c) of this section of the year after the calendar year covered by the form.  a) Jobsite: On or about June 9, 2025, the  employer failed to electronically submit information from their OSHA Form 300A form, or equivalent, for calendar year 2024 by 03/02/2025. The establishment employed 35 employees and is classified with NAICS 238140- Masonry Contractors, during calendar year 2024.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $1986

1926.403 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1116.00 · Current $1116.00
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification.  a) Near doorway: On or about June 9, 2025, employees were exposed to electrical hazards when a power surge strip was plugged into a three prong extension cord, with multiple items plugged into it.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $1116

1926.416 E01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used.   a) Red and black extension cord near doorway: On or about June 9, 2025, the employer did not ensure that an extension cord was inspected prior to use, in that it was missing a grounding pin and the outer sheath was split in multiple areas.   b) Yellow extension cord in the middle of room: On or about June 9, 2025, the employer did not ensure that an extension cord was inspected prior to use, in that the outer sheath was split in multiple areas and copper wiring was exposed at the cord end.   c) Black water pump power cord: On or about June 9, 2025, the employer did not ensure that a water pump cord was inspected prior to use, in that the cord was taped.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View PREMIER LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348296575.