Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: METALTECH SERVICE CENTER, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of METALTECH SERVICE CENTER, LLC in 9915 MONROE ROAD, HOUSTON, TX 77075 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 348319724.

Watch Metaltech Service Center, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Metaltech Service Center, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9915 MONROE ROAD
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77075
Mailing
9915 MONROE ROAD, HOUSTON, TX 77075
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2270.00 · Current $1362.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  a) On or about June 18, 2025, at the facility, energy control procedures were not developed, documented, and utilized by employees performing maintenance and service tasks such as blade changes on KASTOtec models AC5 and AC4 horizontal automatic band saws.  b) On or about June 18, 2025, at the facility, energy control procedures were not developed, documented, and utilized by employees performing maintenance and service tasks such as replacing torch consumable parts on Hypertherm models HPR400XD and HPR400 CNC plasma cutting machines.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1362
  • — Z (S) $2270

1910.147 D02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2270.00 · Current $1362.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(2): The machine or equipment was not turned off or shut down using the procedures established for the machine or equipment:  a) On or about June 18, 2025, at the facility, KASTOtec models AC5 and AC4 horizontal automatic band saws were not shut down before employees performed maintenance tasks, such as changing saw blades.  b) On or about June 18, 2025, at the facility, Hypertherm models HPR400XD and HPR400 CNC plasma cutting machines were not shut down before employees performed maintenance tasks, such as replacing torch consumable parts.  c) On or about June 18, 2025, at the facility, OMAX Models 120X and 80X water and sand cutting machines were not shut down before employees performed maintenance tasks, such as replacing nozzles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1362
  • — Z (S) $2270

1910.147 C04 II C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them:  a) On or about June 18, 2025, at the facility, the energy control procedures used by employees performing maintenance and service tasks, such as servicing pumps, performing oil changes, cleaning, and changing nozzles on OMAX Models 120X and 80X water and sand cutting machines, did not outline the steps for the placement, removal, and transfer of lockout devices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.147 C04 II D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures:  a) On or about June 18, 2025, at the facility, energy control procedures used by employees performing maintenance and service tasks such as servicing pumps, performing oil changes, cleaning, and changing nozzles on OMAX Models 120X and 80X water and sand cutting machines, did not outline requirements for testing the machine to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

RNWBL

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348319724.