Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HORRELL & HELLER CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HORRELL & HELLER CONSTRUCTION in 157 LITTLE DEER CREEK ROAD, CHESWICK, PA 15024 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348456674.

Watch Horrell & Heller Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Horrell & Heller Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
157 LITTLE DEER CREEK ROAD
City
CHESWICK
State
PA
ZIP
15024
Mailing
157 LITTLE DEER CREEK ROAD, CHESWICK, PA 15024
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2270.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:   a) Job site, 112 Josephs Lane, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about August 21, 2025 during deck installation activities, the employer did not ensure an employee used appropriate eye/face protection while operating a nail gun.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2270

1926.501 B02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2270.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(2)(i): Each employee who is constructing a leading edge 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, or where the employer could demonstrate that it was infeasible or created a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer did not develop and implement a fall protection plan which met the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502:  a) Job site, 112 Josephs Lane, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about August 21, 2025 during deck installation activities, the employer did not ensure employees used appropriate fall protection systems/devices where employees were exposed to fall hazards of up to approximately 15 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2270

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2270.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access; or, when such an extension was not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at it's top to a rigid support that would not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:   a) Job site, 112 Josephs Lane, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about August 21, 2025 during deck installation activities, the employer did not ensure a ladder, used to get down from the decking, was set up properly in that it was configured to be used as a stepladder and was positioned below the decking and joist level, exposing an employee to a fall hazard of approximately 15 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2270

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:   a) Job site, 112 Josephs Lane, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about August 21, 2025 during deck installation activities, the employer did not ensure the top or top step of the ladder, configured to be used as a step ladder, was not used as a step in that an employee used it to get down the from the decking, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 15 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.20 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): A program was not provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person designated by the employer:   a) Job site, 112 Josephs Lane, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about August 21, 2025 during deck installation activities, the employer did not ensure a system of hazard identification and abatement was implemented at that job site. Deficiencies noted during the inspection included, but were not limited to, failing to use fall protection, using a ladder in a safe manner, using nail guns without proper eye/face protection, climbing on the guardrails of lift units, leaving a forklift raised in the air, rebar at the site without caps, depressions in the ground not being covered or barricaded & tripping hazards being present.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348456674.