Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
105,991Records 70,589Employers 85,836Hospitalizations 27,959Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-11-30

OSHA Accident Investigation · Summary #14256291

GEORGIA PACIFIC, BRIDGETON VENEER PLANT

Event
DRAG CHAIN CONVEYOR, FRACTURE, WORK PLATFORM
NAICS
000000
Inspection type
Accident-driven
Activity number
#18563486
Employer profile
GEORGIA PACIFIC, BRIDGETON VENEER PLANT
Summary number
14256291
Report ID
453710

Event description

EMPLOYEE SUFFERED LEG FRACTURE WHEN CAUGHT IN DRAG CONVEYOR

Investigation abstract

Employee #1 climbed to a work platform to close a chute door used to fill traile lity. rs with wood chips from a drag conveyor. The trailer being loaded was full but t he chute door opening was jammed open. Once in position at the chute door, Emplo yee #1 signaled Employee #2 to turn off the conveyor. Employee #2 did. Employee #1 removed an enclosure guard from around the drag chain pulley and stood on the chain to direct Employee #2 on the ground to turn off the top conveyor. Employe e #2 misunderstood the directions and started the conveyor on which Employee #1 was standing. Employee #1's leg was caught in the conveyor drag bar and this res ulted in fracture of the lower left leg with hospitalization and extended disabi

Victim

  1. #1 Hospitalized Age 35 Male

    Nature of injury
    Fracture (12)
    Part of body
    LEGS (16)
    Accident type
    CAUGHT IN OR BETWEEN (2)
    Source of injury
    MATERIALS HANDLG EQ. (27)
    Occupation
    Metal plating machine operators (723)
    Human factor
    EQUIP. INAPPROPR FOR OPERATION (6)
    Environmental factor
    CATCH POINT/PUNCTURE ACTION (2)
    Task assigned
    Task regularly assigned (1)

Labels are OSHA's own, from the code dictionary published with the accident-investigation file. The raw code is shown beside each one so this page can be reconciled against OSHA's bulk data. OSHA notes that nature of injury, part of body, source of injury and accident type in this file are not coded to the Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System, and that the occupation titles are not standardised — so these values are not directly comparable with the OIICS-coded severe injury reports.