Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
105,991Records 70,589Employers 85,836Hospitalizations 27,959Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-11-30

OSHA Accident Investigation · Summary #14330617

U.S. DEPT OF DEFENSE, TOBYHANNA ARMY DEPOT

Event
E GI II, ELEC PROTECT EQUIP, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRICAL TESTING, ELECTROCUTED, ELECTRONIC TECHNICN, TEST EQUIPMENT
NAICS
000000
Inspection type
Accident-driven
Activity number
#624205
Employer profile
U.S. DEPT OF DEFENSE, TOBYHANNA ARMY DEPOT
Summary number
14330617
Report ID
317700

Event description

ELECTRIC SHOCK - CONTACT WITH ENERGIZED PARTS

Investigation abstract

An employee was testing the 9000-volt dc output from a satellite communications supply. His supervisor was manually increasing the voltage with a rheostat-type variac when he noticed that the needle on the voltmeter was not working. The sup ervisor yelled to the employee, who was reading his electrostatic voltmeter, to check the voltage adjustment rod or to see if the temporary high-voltage lead wa s connected. Either the employee contacted live parts, or the voltmeter failed. The employee was electrocuted. The employee's belt buckle had apparently been in contact with a grounded metal screw. A burn mark was found on the belt buckle, the metal screw, and behind and under the voltmeter.

Victim

  1. #1 Fatality Age 44 Male

    Nature of injury
    Electric Shock (10)
    Part of body
    BODYSYSTEM (4)
    Accident type
    CARD-VASC/RESP FAIL. (12)
    Source of injury
    ELEC APPARAT/WIRING (15)
    Occupation
    Electronic repairers, communica. & indus. equip. (523)
    Human factor
    INSUFF/LACK/WRITN WRK PRAC PROG. (18)
    Environmental factor
    WORK-SURFACE/FACIL-LAYOUT COND (13)
    Task assigned
    Task not regularly assigned (2)

Labels are OSHA's own, from the code dictionary published with the accident-investigation file. The raw code is shown beside each one so this page can be reconciled against OSHA's bulk data. OSHA notes that nature of injury, part of body, source of injury and accident type in this file are not coded to the Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System, and that the occupation titles are not standardised — so these values are not directly comparable with the OIICS-coded severe injury reports.