105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Accident Investigation · Summary #779355

STATIC ELECTRICITY,WORK RULES,FIRE,MIXER,CONDUCTIVE APPAREL,CHEMICAL REACTION,CHEMICAL BURN,UNTRAINED,MECH MALFUNCTION

Event
STATIC ELECTRICITY,WORK RULES,FIRE,MIXER,CONDUCTIVE APPAREL,CHEMICAL REACTION,CHEMICAL BURN,UNTRAINED,MECH MALFUNCTION
Linked inspection
No inspection record linked to this accident's victims.
Summary number
779355
Report ID
953210

Event description

Employees burned in chemical fire

Investigation abstract

Employees #1 and #2 were adding ammonium perchlorate into a mixer that was mixin ve; nor was there a proper sieve available for use within the room. Also, the st andard operating procedure is to have a mixing employee and supervisor in the mi xing room and another employee in the remote operating station or bunker watchin g a TV monitor to react to any emergency situation, but the remote station was n ot staffed. Further contributing factors which may have influenced this accident include the fact that the employees were adding 2 1/2 micron sized ammonium per chlorine to the mix, causing the humidifier to malfunction. The humidity therefo re dropped down to approximately 5 percent (normal humidity at 75 degrees is bet ween 30 percent and 70 percent) and on-site weather station recorded an abrupt w eather change at approximately the same time as the accident. In addition to the g a batch of solid propellant. A flash fire occurred, causing multiple burns to humidity changes, the wind picked up and a sudden temperature change took place . Employees #1 and #2 stated in a interview that they saw the ammonium perchlora te cling to the sides of the mixer when they were attempting to add it to the ba tch. This should have been a red flag to the employees that a static charge was present, but they were unable to recognize the hazard due to their lack of train ing. Employee #2 and arm burns to Employee #1. They were both hospitalized. Both empl oyees were in on-the-job training and were supposed to be supervised at all time s during any mixing operation. The supervisor had left prior to the mixing opera tion and did not return. The lack of a supervisor and inadequate hazard communic ation resulted in the following violations: non-conductive shoes were worn in a conductive shoe area; the sieve that was used was not provided with a bonding st rap, which would have allowed a bond to form between the mixing unit and the sie

Victims (2)

  1. #1 Hospitalized Age 35 M

    Nature of injury
    5
    Part of body
    2
    Event type
    14
    Source
    14
    Occupation code
    519
    Human factor
    18
    Environmental factor
    10
    Hazardous substance
    8880
    Task assigned
    2
  2. #2 Hospitalized Age 30 F

    Nature of injury
    5
    Part of body
    19
    Event type
    14
    Source
    14
    Occupation code
    224
    Human factor
    18
    Environmental factor
    10
    Hazardous substance
    8880
    Task assigned
    2

Codes shown verbatim from OSHA's accident-investigation database. A human-readable decoder is coming in a future release once the accident_lookup2 dictionary is loaded.