Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
105,991Records 71,450Employers 85,836Hospitalizations 27,959Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-11-30

OSHA Accident Investigation · Summary #779355

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORP

Event
STATIC ELECTRICITY, WORK RULES, FIRE, MIXER, CONDUCTIVE APPAREL, CHEMICAL REACTION, CHEMICAL BURN, UNTRAINED, MECH MALFUNCTION
NAICS
000000
Inspection type
Accident-driven
Activity number
#104620372
Employer profile
HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORP
Summary number
779355
Report ID
953210

Event description

Employees burned in chemical fire

Investigation abstract

Employees #1 and #2 were adding ammonium perchlorate into a mixer that was mixin ve; nor was there a proper sieve available for use within the room. Also, the st andard operating procedure is to have a mixing employee and supervisor in the mi xing room and another employee in the remote operating station or bunker watchin g a TV monitor to react to any emergency situation, but the remote station was n ot staffed. Further contributing factors which may have influenced this accident include the fact that the employees were adding 2 1/2 micron sized ammonium per chlorine to the mix, causing the humidifier to malfunction. The humidity therefo re dropped down to approximately 5 percent (normal humidity at 75 degrees is bet ween 30 percent and 70 percent) and on-site weather station recorded an abrupt w eather change at approximately the same time as the accident. In addition to the g a batch of solid propellant. A flash fire occurred, causing multiple burns to humidity changes, the wind picked up and a sudden temperature change took place . Employees #1 and #2 stated in a interview that they saw the ammonium perchlora te cling to the sides of the mixer when they were attempting to add it to the ba tch. This should have been a red flag to the employees that a static charge was present, but they were unable to recognize the hazard due to their lack of train ing. Employee #2 and arm burns to Employee #1. They were both hospitalized. Both empl oyees were in on-the-job training and were supposed to be supervised at all time s during any mixing operation. The supervisor had left prior to the mixing opera tion and did not return. The lack of a supervisor and inadequate hazard communic ation resulted in the following violations: non-conductive shoes were worn in a conductive shoe area; the sieve that was used was not provided with a bonding st rap, which would have allowed a bond to form between the mixing unit and the sie

Victims (2)

  1. #1 Hospitalized Age 35 M

    Nature of injury
    5
    Part of body
    2
    Event type
    14
    Source
    14
    Occupation code
    519
    Human factor
    18
    Environmental factor
    10
    Hazardous substance
    8880
    Task assigned
    2
  2. #2 Hospitalized Age 30 F

    Nature of injury
    5
    Part of body
    19
    Event type
    14
    Source
    14
    Occupation code
    224
    Human factor
    18
    Environmental factor
    10
    Hazardous substance
    8880
    Task assigned
    2

Codes shown verbatim from OSHA's accident-investigation database. A human-readable decoder is coming in a future release once the accident_lookup2 dictionary is loaded.