Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
105,991Records 70,589Employers 85,836Hospitalizations 27,959Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-11-30

OSHA Accident Investigation · Summary #785048

HARCO MANUFACTURING CO

Event
DIE, AMPUTATED, INADEQUATE MAINT, PRESS BRAKE, FINGER, POINT OF OPERATION, PUNCH PRESS, RAM
NAICS
000000
Inspection type
Accident-driven
Activity number
#105186985
Employer profile
HARCO MANUFACTURING CO
Summary number
785048
Report ID
1054112

Event description

Employee's fingers amputated in punch press

Investigation abstract

At approximately 2:50 p.m. on May 17, 1989, Employee #1 was operating an L & J 5 0 ton punch press to form 1 1/8 in. by 34 in. long pieces with a press brake-typ e die set. To achieve the close tolerances required for these parts, Employee #1 had to lower the ram adjustment to get the worn shop-built dies to close adequa tely. After the ram of the press stopped at the top of its stroke on the 43rd pa rt, Employee #1 reached into the dies with his right hand to retrieve the part. The clutch key broke and the ram came down on his hand. Employee #1 pulled his h and back as the dies opened and the machine continued to stroke. Portions of all four fingers on his right hand were amputated.

Victim

  1. #1 Hospitalized Age 25 Male

    Nature of injury
    Amputation (1)
    Part of body
    FINGER(S) (10)
    Accident type
    CAUGHT IN OR BETWEEN (2)
    Source of injury
    MACHINE (26)
    Occupation
    Punching and stamping press machine operators (706)
    Human factor
    SAFETY DEVICES REMOVED/INOPER. (9)
    Environmental factor
    SQUEEZE POINT ACTION (4)
    Task assigned
    Task regularly assigned (1)

Labels are OSHA's own, from the code dictionary published with the accident-investigation file. The raw code is shown beside each one so this page can be reconciled against OSHA's bulk data. OSHA notes that nature of injury, part of body, source of injury and accident type in this file are not coded to the Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System, and that the occupation titles are not standardised — so these values are not directly comparable with the OIICS-coded severe injury reports.