Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
105,991Records 70,589Employers 85,836Hospitalizations 27,959Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-11-30

OSHA Accident Investigation · Summary #890657

CAMBRIDGE WIRE CLOTH CO., INC.

Event
FRACTURE, AMPUTATED, FINGER, WORK RULES, LOCKOUT, LACERATION, NIP POINT, UNGUARDED
NAICS
000000
Inspection type
Accident-driven
Activity number
#108406471
Employer profile
CAMBRIDGE WIRE CLOTH CO., INC.
Summary number
890657
Report ID
352410

Event description

Employee's fingers injured when caught in loom nip point

Investigation abstract

Employee #1 was making a 25 in. wide wire mat on a positive motion loom. When op o prevent hands or fingers from entering a danger zone. erating this loom, he is required to change a bobbin each time the wire is exhau sted from the bobbin. When changing the bobbin, he uses a pair of hand-held wire cutters to cut the end of the wire that is woven into the mat. There are wire o penings on each side of the wire mat where the employee reaches in to cut the wi re. While his hand was in the opening, the machine started and his right hand wa s caught in a nip point, amputating half of his middle finger, and severely lace rating and fracturing his index finger in four places. The area of the nip point where the moveable part of the loom moves toward a fixed part was not guarded t

Victim

  1. #1 Hospitalized Age 34 Male

    Nature of injury
    Amputation (1)
    Part of body
    FINGER(S) (10)
    Accident type
    CAUGHT IN OR BETWEEN (2)
    Source of injury
    MACHINE (26)
    Occupation
    Misc. metal,plastic,stone&glass-working mach. op's (715)
    Human factor
    OTHER (14)
    Environmental factor
    SQUEEZE POINT ACTION (4)
    Task assigned
    Task regularly assigned (1)

Labels are OSHA's own, from the code dictionary published with the accident-investigation file. The raw code is shown beside each one so this page can be reconciled against OSHA's bulk data. OSHA notes that nature of injury, part of body, source of injury and accident type in this file are not coded to the Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System, and that the occupation titles are not standardised — so these values are not directly comparable with the OIICS-coded severe injury reports.