Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
105,991Records 70,589Employers 85,836Hospitalizations 27,959Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-11-30

OSHA Accident Investigation · Summary #892141

TATE ACCESS FLOORS, INC.

Event
FRACTURE, FINGER, WORK RULES, CAUGHT BY, LACERATION, UNTRAINED, PRESS, UNGUARDED, BLIND REACHING, MACHINE--MISC
NAICS
000000
Inspection type
Accident-driven
Activity number
#108432055
Employer profile
TATE ACCESS FLOORS, INC.
Summary number
892141
Report ID
352440

Event description

Employee's finger injured in scrap cutter

Investigation abstract

Employee #1 was testing die components for proper alignment using an Equip-Aide the press. Engineering Ltd. press, serial #0020-0470, model #01-20 (2), company designation Tapco-1165. He started the press on automatic and went around to the side of th e machine, effectively bypassing the operation's light curtain. He reached his r ight hand near the die area to feel the left rear bushing and was caught by the rear scrap cutter, sustaining severe lacerations and a fracture of the right rin g finger between the nail base and the first joint. Causal factors improper trai ning in safe installation procedures, misjudgment of a hazardous situation, bypa ssing an effective light curtain guard, and lack of guarding on the left side of

Victim

  1. #1 Hospitalized Age 35 Male

    Nature of injury
    Cut/Laceration (7)
    Part of body
    FINGER(S) (10)
    Accident type
    CAUGHT IN OR BETWEEN (2)
    Source of injury
    MACHINE (26)
    Occupation
    Punching and stamping press machine operators (706)
    Human factor
    MISJUDGMENT, HAZ. SITUATION (1)
    Environmental factor
    SHEAR POINT ACTION (3)
    Task assigned
    Task regularly assigned (1)

Labels are OSHA's own, from the code dictionary published with the accident-investigation file. The raw code is shown beside each one so this page can be reconciled against OSHA's bulk data. OSHA notes that nature of injury, part of body, source of injury and accident type in this file are not coded to the Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System, and that the occupation titles are not standardised — so these values are not directly comparable with the OIICS-coded severe injury reports.