Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
105,991Records 70,589Employers 85,836Hospitalizations 27,959Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-11-30

OSHA Accident Investigation · Summary #954628

RIVERSIDE ANTIQUES

Event
PHOSGENE, ASPHYXIATED, VENTILATION, HYDROGEN CHLORIDE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, WORK RULES, INHALATION, TOXIC FUMES, OVEREXPOSURE, RESPIRATOR
NAICS
000000
Inspection type
Accident-driven
Activity number
#3330313
Employer profile
RIVERSIDE ANTIQUES
Summary number
954628
Report ID
355112

Event description

Employee dies when overcome by solvent vapors

Investigation abstract

Between 4:00 and 5:35 p.m. on May 5, 1989, Employee #1 was using a wire brush to strip away paint from metal registers in a large vat containing a stripping sol ution. He was working alone in a room that was approximately 34 ft long by 14 1/ 2 ft wide by 8 ft high with no forced ventilation. The stripping solution was GB 150 (trade name) and contained about 80 percent methylene chloride, which is kno wn to break down and emit phosgene and hydrogen chloride. Employee #1 was not we aring respiratory protection. He was overcome by solvent vapors resulting in acu te toxicity and cardiac dysrhythmia from halogenated hydrocarbons in the solvent . He died.

Victim

  1. #1 Fatality Age 21 Male

    Nature of injury
    Asphyxia (2)
    Part of body
    LUNG (28)
    Accident type
    INHALATION (8)
    Source of injury
    CHEM LIQUIDS/VAPORS (9)
    Occupation
    Furniture and wood finishers (658)
    Human factor
    INSUFF/LACK/RESPIRATORY PROCTECT (19)
    Environmental factor
    GAS/VAPOR/MIST/FUME/SMOKE/DUST (7)
    Hazardous substance
    1730
    Task assigned
    Task regularly assigned (1)

Labels are OSHA's own, from the code dictionary published with the accident-investigation file. The raw code is shown beside each one so this page can be reconciled against OSHA's bulk data. OSHA notes that nature of injury, part of body, source of injury and accident type in this file are not coded to the Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System, and that the occupation titles are not standardised — so these values are not directly comparable with the OIICS-coded severe injury reports.