Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
105,991Records 70,589Employers 85,836Hospitalizations 27,959Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-11-30

OSHA Accident Investigation · Summary #977694

COMBUSTION ENGINEERING INC

Event
CHEST, HEAD, ABDOMEN, PIPE, STRUCK BY, FLYING OBJECT
NAICS
000000
Inspection type
Complaint
Activity number
#107908568
Employer profile
COMBUSTION ENGINEERING INC
Summary number
977694
Report ID
454713

Event description

Employee killed when struck by flying steel pipe elbow

Investigation abstract

Employee #1 was preparing to make a cut on a steel pipe elbow that was approxima pm) the machine would automatically speed up to the maximum rpm. This is assumed to be the cause of the excessive rpm. tely 56 in. long by 20 1/2 in. in diameter and estimated to weigh 1,500 to 2,000 lb. The work piece was held in a steel cradle that was mounted on the table of a Toshiba Shibaura CNC vertical mill #7838. The work piece broke free from the c radle, apparently from excessive machine rpm, and was thrown from the machine. E mployee #1, who was standing at a moveable panel approximately 4 ft away, was st ruck and suffered multiple injuries to the head, chest, and abdomen from which h e died. This mill was equipped with an override control that controlled the tabl e rpm. When turned down past the lowest setting (50 percent of maximum cutting r

Victim

  1. #1 Fatality Age 39 Male

    Nature of injury
    Bruise/Contus/Abras (3)
    Part of body
    MULTIPLE (19)
    Accident type
    STRUCK BY (1)
    Source of injury
    MACHINE (26)
    Occupation
    Machinists (637)
    Human factor
    OTHER (14)
    Environmental factor
    FLYING OBJECT ACTION (5)
    Task assigned
    Task regularly assigned (1)

Labels are OSHA's own, from the code dictionary published with the accident-investigation file. The raw code is shown beside each one so this page can be reconciled against OSHA's bulk data. OSHA notes that nature of injury, part of body, source of injury and accident type in this file are not coded to the Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System, and that the occupation titles are not standardised — so these values are not directly comparable with the OIICS-coded severe injury reports.