Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
105,991Records 70,589Employers 85,836Hospitalizations 27,959Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-11-30

OSHA Accident Investigation · Summary #980318

ELGIN JOLIET & EASTERN RAILROAD

Event
SAND, MOLTEN METAL, BURN, FURNACE, DAM, RAIL, BLAST FURNACE, UNSTABLE SOIL, HIGH TEMPERATURE
NAICS
000000
Inspection type
Accident-driven
Activity number
#107930992
Employer profile
ELGIN JOLIET & EASTERN RAILROAD
Summary number
980318
Report ID
551800

Event description

Employee dies after burned by molten metal

Investigation abstract

At approximately 3:20 a.m. on March 5, 1989, Employee #1 was repairing rails on the B track underneath the south B spout of blast furnace #7 due to a previous s pill. As Employee #1 was repairing the tracks, the blast furnace began to cast h ot metal into a ladle on the A track. A dam made of sand, which had been built i n the trough for the south B spout, had erupted, allowing hot metal to run down into the area where Employee #1 was working. Employee #1 sustained burns over 80 percent of his body. He was taken by ambulance to Mercy Hospital and then by he licopter to the University of Chicago Hospital Burn Center. Employee #1 was in s table but critical condition, but died March 25, 1989.

Victims (2)

  1. #1 Fatality Age 53 Male

    Nature of injury
    Burn/Scald(Heat) (5)
    Part of body
    MULTIPLE (19)
    Accident type
    STRUCK BY (1)
    Source of injury
    METAL PRODUCTS (28)
    Occupation
    Helpers, mechanics and repairers (864)
    Human factor
    MALFUNC IN SECURING/WARNING OP (4)
    Environmental factor
    OVERHEAD MOVING/FALLING OBJ AC (6)
    Hazardous substance
    8880
    Task assigned
    Task not regularly assigned (2)
  2. #981

Labels are OSHA's own, from the code dictionary published with the accident-investigation file. The raw code is shown beside each one so this page can be reconciled against OSHA's bulk data. OSHA notes that nature of injury, part of body, source of injury and accident type in this file are not coded to the Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System, and that the occupation titles are not standardised — so these values are not directly comparable with the OIICS-coded severe injury reports.