Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
105,991Records 70,589Employers 85,836Hospitalizations 27,959Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-11-30

OSHA Accident Investigation · Summary #981373

NEW YORK BLOWER CO

Event
DIE, AMPUTATED, FINGER, FOOT CONTROL, HYDRAULIC PRESS, HAND, RAM
NAICS
000000
Inspection type
Accident-driven
Activity number
#108000209
Employer profile
NEW YORK BLOWER CO
Summary number
981373
Report ID
551800

Event description

EMPLOYEE'S FINGERS AMPUTATED WHEN CAUGHT IN BRAKE PRESS

Investigation abstract

At approximately 10:15 p.m., on May 18, 1989, Employee #1 was operating a Pacifi c 200-ton-hydraulic brake press, New York blower, Serial Number 05282. The press was activated by a foot pedal and did not have two-hand trip buttons. Employee #1 was making a die change and put the bottom die on the press. Employee #1 star ted to put top die on the ram. When Employee #1 slid the die on the ram he put h is hand under the top die to help slide the die into position. When Employee #1 did this he apparently moved his foot and stepped on the foot control. The ram a nd die came down and amputated the four fingers on his left hand at the metacarp al joints. Employee #1 was then taken to the hospital for medical treatment.

Victim

  1. #1 Hospitalized Age 25 Male

    Nature of injury
    Amputation (1)
    Part of body
    FINGER(S) (10)
    Accident type
    CAUGHT IN OR BETWEEN (2)
    Source of injury
    MACHINE (26)
    Occupation
    Punching and stamping press machine operators (706)
    Human factor
    SAFETY DEVICES REMOVED/INOPER. (9)
    Environmental factor
    PINCH POINT ACTION (1)
    Task assigned
    Task regularly assigned (1)

Labels are OSHA's own, from the code dictionary published with the accident-investigation file. The raw code is shown beside each one so this page can be reconciled against OSHA's bulk data. OSHA notes that nature of injury, part of body, source of injury and accident type in this file are not coded to the Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System, and that the occupation titles are not standardised — so these values are not directly comparable with the OIICS-coded severe injury reports.