105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

ABF Freight

Federal OSHA safety record across 8 records in 6 states.

Federal OSHA records for ABF Freight include 8 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 0 OSHA inspections, spanning 6 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

SIR8 records Injuries0 records Inspections0 records

Date range to

Most recent 8 of 8 reports for this employer.

ABF Freight

Event Other fall to lower level unspecified

Hospitalized

ABF Freight

EventCompressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipment

Amputation

ABF Freight

EventStruck by object or equipment dropped by injured worker

Hospitalized

ABF Freight

EventPedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in nonroadway area

Hospitalized

ABF Freight

EventCompressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipment

Hospitalized

ABF Freight

EventOther fall to lower level less than 6 feet

Hospitalized

ABF Freight

EventStruck against stationary object or equipment, n.e.c.

Hospitalized

ABF Freight

EventCompressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipment

Amputation

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

No OSHA inspections recorded for this employer.

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

DAYTON, OHIO
2 records
ORLANDO, FLORIDA
1 record
CONLEY, GEORGIA
1 record
SAINT LOUIS, MISSOURI
1 record
ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA
1 record
PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA
1 record
FORT WORTH, TEXAS
1 record
NAICS 481212
NAICS 484110
NAICS 484121
NAICS 484230

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.