Employer profile — 1974-02-07 to 1982-03-25

ATLANTA COCA COLA BOTTLING

Federal OSHA safety record across 5 records in GA.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for ATLANTA COCA COLA BOTTLING include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 5 OSHA inspections, spanning GA, with incidents dated between 1974-02-07 and 1982-03-25. Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Watch ATLANTA COCA COLA BOTTLING — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ATLANTA COCA COLA BOTTLING is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections5 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 5

Date range1974-02-07 to 1982-03-25

Most recent 5 of 5 inspections for this employer.

Marietta, GA — 1982-03-25

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA: ATLANTA COCA COLA BOTTLING
Also appears in filings as: ATLANTA COCA-COLA BOTTLING
States with records: GA

Addresses on OSHA filings

1 record: 1091 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR, MARIETTA, GA 30060
1 record: 1091 INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE, MARIETTA, GA 30060
1 record: 167 GREENVILLE ST, NEWNAN, GA 30263
1 record: 312 NORTH HIGHTOWER ST, THOMASTON, GA 30286
1 record: 312 NORTH HIGHTOWER STREET, THOMASTON, GA 30286

Locations on record

Marietta, GA: 2 records
Thomaston, GA: 2 records
Newnan, GA: 1 record

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.