Employer profile — 1976-10-27 to 1980-10-03

AVIS TRUCK RENTAL

Federal OSHA safety record across 4 records in MA.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for AVIS TRUCK RENTAL include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 4 OSHA inspections, spanning MA, with incidents dated between 1976-10-27 and 1980-10-03. Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Watch AVIS TRUCK RENTAL — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for AVIS TRUCK RENTAL is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections4 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 4

Date range1976-10-27 to 1980-10-03

Most recent 4 of 4 inspections for this employer.

Boston, MA — 1980-10-03

AVIS TRUCK RENTAL

TypeComplaint DisciplineSafety Activity #10030740

Boston, MA — 1978-06-01

AVIS TRUCK RENTAL

TypeFollow-up DisciplineSafety Activity #10224103

Boston, MA — 1978-03-20

AVIS TRUCK RENTAL

TypeComplaint DisciplineSafety Activity #10223527

Boston, MA — 1976-10-27

AVIS TRUCK RENTAL

TypeComplaint DisciplineHealth Activity #10084325

Recent OSHA citations

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA: AVIS TRUCK RENTAL
States with records: MA

Addresses on OSHA filings

4 records: 163 SHIRLEY STREET, BOSTON, MA 02119

Locations on record

Boston, MA: 4 records

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.