Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31

BITTERROOT MOTORS

Federal OSHA safety record across 2 records in MT.

Federal OSHA records for BITTERROOT MOTORS include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 2 OSHA inspections, spanning MT, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Watch BITTERROOT MOTORS — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BITTERROOT MOTORS is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections2 records Citations4

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

Date range

Most recent 2 of 2 inspections for this employer.

BITTERROOT MOTORS

TypePlanned DisciplineHealth Activity #340706977

BITTERROOT MOTORS

TypePlanned DisciplineSafety Activity #340706340

Most recent 4 citations issued under any inspection of this employer. Each row links back to the parent inspection.

19100212 A01

TypeSerious Penalty$0.00 View inspection →

Serious

19100303 B07 IV

TypeSerious Penalty$0.00 View inspection →

Serious

19100253 B02 II

TypeSerious Penalty$1260.00 View inspection →

Serious

19100134 C02 II

TypeOther-than-serious Penalty$0.00 View inspection →

Other-than-serious
Name as filed with OSHA
BITTERROOT MOTORS
States with records
MT
2 records
3943 BROOKS STREET, MISSOULA, MT 59808
MISSOULA, MT
2 records
NAICS 441110

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.