Employer profile — 1979-01-09 to 1985-07-18

BODENHAMER BUILDING CORP

Federal OSHA safety record across 5 records in GA.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for BODENHAMER BUILDING CORP include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 5 OSHA inspections, spanning GA, with incidents dated between 1979-01-09 and 1985-07-18. Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

Watch BODENHAMER BUILDING CORP — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BODENHAMER BUILDING CORP is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

By source

SIR0 records Injuries0 records Inspections5 records

Severe Injury Reports — 0

No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 5

Date range1979-01-09 to 1985-07-18

Most recent 5 of 5 inspections for this employer.

FORT GORDON, GA — 1985-07-18

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Company facts

Name as filed with OSHA: BODENHAMER BUILDING CORP
Also appears in filings as: BODENHAMER BUILDING CORP.
States with records: GA

Addresses on OSHA filings

1 record: 7TH AVENUE, FORT GORDON, GA 30905
1 record: COX RD-COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHO, EVANS, GA 30809
1 record: EVANS COMP H S OFF COX RD, EVANS, GA 30809
1 record: EVANS COMPREHENSIVE H ST, EVANS, GA 30809
1 record: NAVAL SUBMARINE BASE, KINGS BAY, GA 31547

Locations on record

Evans, GA: 3 records
FORT GORDON, GA: 1 record
Kings Bay, GA: 1 record

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.