Employer profile — to
TEXTILE PRINTING COMPANY
Federal OSHA safety record across 1 record in TN.
At a glance
Federal OSHA records for TEXTILE PRINTING COMPANY include 0 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 1 OSHA inspection, spanning TN, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.
By source
Severe Injury Reports — 0
No Severe Injury Reports recorded for this employer.
ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0
No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.
OSHA Inspections — 1
Most recent 2 of 1 inspections for this employer.
CHATTANOOGA, TN —
TEXTILE PRINTING COMPANY
CHATTANOOGA, TN —
TEXTILE PRINTING COMPANY
Recent OSHA citations
Most recent 7 citations issued under any inspection of this employer. Each row links back to the parent inspection.
Activity #317223451 —
19100095 D01
Activity #317223451 —
19100095 I02 I
Activity #317223451 —
19100133 A01
Activity #317223451 —
19100138 A
Activity #317223451 —
19100242 B
Activity #317223451 —
19100305 B01
Activity #317223451 —
19101200 F06 II
EPA environmental compliance record
U.S. EPA enforcement history (ECHO) for 1 facility matching this employer's name and states, highest penalties first. Facilities are matched by normalized name plus state — verify identity on the linked EPA report before drawing conclusions.
CHATTANOOGA, TN
TEXTILE PRINTING COMPANY
Company facts
- Name as filed with OSHA
- TEXTILE PRINTING COMPANY
- States with records
- TN
Addresses on OSHA filings
- 2 records
- 6107 RINGGOLD RD, CHATTANOOGA, TN 37412
Locations on record
- CHATTANOOGA, TN
- 1 record
Industries (NAICS codes seen)
Sources
This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.