Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: VECO DRILLING, INC.

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of VECO DRILLING, INC. in EAST OF WCR RD. 29, & HWY 85, GILCREST, CO 80623 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 100026525.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Veco Drilling, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Veco Drilling, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VECO DRILLING, INC.
Site address
EAST OF WCR RD. 29, & HWY 85
City
GILCREST
State
CO
ZIP
80623
Mailing
785 22 RD., GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81502
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1381
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 1992
Abate by
Feb 28, 1992
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
The alleged violations below have been  grouped  because  they  involve
%%
similar or related hazards that may increase the potential  for  injury
resulting from an accident.
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were
exposed to:
(a)  Drilling site located near Gilcrest, CO within Section
16, Township 317, Range 65 West - On or about August 6, 1991
and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that
each employee working on Rig #3 received Blowout Preventer
Classes, did not ensure that employee(s) were trained to
recognize the need to test the Hydril upon installation and
during each round trip, did not ensure that employee(s) were
trained in necessary inspection and maintenance procedures
for the Hydril, and did not ensure that training regarding
how to operate the blowout preventer was provided to each
employee.
Among other methods, feasible and acceptable methods to
correct these hazards are:
Ensure that each employee receives blowout preventer
training, ensure that employees are trained to recognize the
need to test the Hydril upon installation and during each
round trip, ensure that employees receive training in
necessary inspection and maintenance procedures for the
Hydril, and ensure that training is provided to each employ-
ee regarding how to operate the blowout preventer used on
the rig.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2250.00
  • · Z (S) $4500.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 1992
Abate by
Feb 28, 1992
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
%%
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were
exposed to:
(a)  Drilling site loacted near Gilcrest, CO within Section
16, Township 317, Range 65 West - On or about August 6, 1991
and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that
the blowout preventer provided on Rig #3 was inspected,
maintained and operationally tested as specified in industry
publications such as API RP53, dated May 1984, API RP54,
dated January 1981, and the Accident Prevention Manual of
the International Association of Drilling Contractors, March
1979 edition.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to
correct this hazard is:
Ensure that the company policy stated in the revised Safety
and Accident Prevention Program regarding performing blowout
preventer test is enforced and that inspection, maintance,
and operational test procedures described in API RP53 and
RP54 as well as the Accident Prevention Manual of the IADC
are followed.

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 1992
Abate by
Feb 28, 1992

View Veco Drilling, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 100026525.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.