Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: U-MAX ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of U-MAX ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CORP. in STREET FRONTING 32 FLORENCE PLACE, NORTH HALEDON, NJ 07508 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 100728864.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch U-Max Engineering and Construction Corp. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for U-Max Engineering and Construction Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
STREET FRONTING 32 FLORENCE PLACE
City
NORTH HALEDON
State
NJ
ZIP
07508
Mailing
P.O. BOX 280-ROUTE 3L, RINGOES, NJ 08551
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1623
Employees
13
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Construction safety.

4 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 19, 1986
Abate by
Aug 22, 1986
Penalty
Initial $490 · Current $490
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment that were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees, In that employees were exposed to
being struck by a Case Loader Backhoe, Model 5800, with 7' 6" x 12',
2700 lb, blasting mat attached to the load bucket's hook by a chain
sling elevated in the maximum position while operating and traveling
over sloped, displaced pavement.  Equipment used was not appropriate
for the task involved.
a) Street Fronting, 32 Florence Place, North Haledon, NJ
One feasible and acceptable method, among others, to correct this
hazard is:
1) Discontinue use of loader backhoe as a crane.
2) Prohibit traveling while load bucket is extended to maximum
elevation.
3) Train and provide operator with a copy of the operator's manual to
ensure adherence to manufacturer's instructions for machine
operation.
4) Use equipment properly rated for task to be performed.

1926.651 I01

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 19, 1986
Abate by
Aug 22, 1986
Penalty
Initial $140 · Current $110 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $110.00
  • · Z (S) $140.00

1926.652 C

Willful 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 19, 1986
Abate by
Aug 22, 1986
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (W) $2400.00
  • · Z (W) $3500.00

1926.450 A09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 19, 1986
Abate by
Aug 22, 1986

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 100728864.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.