MINDEN, NE —
OSHA Inspection: FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER - MINDEN
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER - MINDEN in 244 N. MINDEN AVENUE, MINDEN, NE 68959 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 100742634.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER - MINDEN
- Site address
- 244 N. MINDEN AVENUE
- City
- MINDEN
- State
- NE
- ZIP
- 68959
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8069
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Health care workers such as nurses, nurse aides, phlebotomists and housekeepers, facility wide who were exposed to the hazard of being infected by HBV/HIV through possible direct contact with blood or other body fluids in that: 1) Linen. The Infection Disease Control Program (ICP) did not identify all laundry operations involving substantial risk of direct exposure to body fluids. Linens soiled with body fluids were rinsed by nurses before being bagged and transported to the laundry. This is contrary to the Center for Disease Control (DC) guidelines published in morbidity and mortality weekly report June 24, 1988, Volumn 37 - Number 24. 2) Nurses had not been trained in follow-up procedures after possible exposure to HIV or HBV. Specifically the procedures follwing a percutaneous (needlestick or cut) or mucous membrane (splash to eye, nasal mucosa or mouth) exposure to body fluids or has a cutaneous exposure to blood when the nurses skin is chapped, abraded or otherwise nonintact. Among other procedures nurses were not trained to inform the source patient of the incident and test him/her for HIV and HBV infections, after consent is obtained. Feasible and useful abatement method for reducing the hazard among others: 1. a) If a health caree worker has a percutaneous (needlestick or cut) or mucous membrane (splash to eye, nasal mucosa or mouth) exposure to body fluids or has a cutaneous exposure to blood when the worker's skin is chapped, abraded or otherwise nonintact, the source patient shall be informed of the incid- ent and tested for HIV and HBV infections, after consent is obtained. b) If patient consent is refused or if the source patient tests positive, the health care worker shall be evaluated clinically and by HIV antibody testing as soon as possible and advised to report and seek medical evaluation of any acute febrile illness that occurs within 12 weeks after exposure. HIV seronegative workers shall be retested 6 weeks post-exposure and on a periodic basis thereafter (12 weeks and 6 months after ex- posure). c) Follow up procedures shall be taken for health care workers exposed or potentially exposed to HBV. The types of procedures depends on the immunization status of the worker (i.e., whether HBV vaccination has been received and antibody response is adequate) and the HBV serologic status of the source patient. The CDC Immunization Practices Advisory Committee has published its recommendations regarding HBV postexposure prohylaxis in table format in June 7, 1985, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. d) If an employee refuses to submit to the procedures in (b) or (c) above when such procedures are medically indicated, no adverse action can be taken on that ground alone since the procedures are designed for the benefit of the exposed employee. 2. Linen. The IC program shall have identified all laundry operations involving substantial risk of direct exposure to body fluids. Linen soiled with body fluids shall be handled as little as possible and with minimum agitation to prevent contamination of the person handling the linen. All soiled linen shall be bagged at the location where it was used; it shall not be sorted or rinsed in patient-care areas. Soiled linen shall be placed and transported in bags that prevent leakage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Dec 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $360 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $360.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1903.2 A01
- Issued
- Dec 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $180 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $180.00
- — Z (O) $300.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Dec 3, 1991
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $180 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $180.00
- — Z (O) $300.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 100742634.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.