GRAND JUNCTION, CO —
OSHA Inspection: U. S. SACK CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of U. S. SACK CORPORATION in 640 S. 12TH ST., GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 100745231.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- U. S. SACK CORPORATION
- Site address
- 640 S. 12TH ST.
- City
- GRAND JUNCTION
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 81501
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2393
- Employees
- 90
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Feb 4, 1993
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 1993
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Feb 4, 1993
- Abate by
- Feb 25, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $875.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1993
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $525
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform tasks involving ergonomic risk factors (including, but not limited to, repetitive motions, force and awkward postures) resulting in stressors that had caused, were causing, or were likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders: (a) Employees working as production line sewers were exposed to undue repetitive motion trauma. These operations included ergonomic stressors such as frequent pinch grips, torso flexions, reaches, throws, wrist deviations and long periods of sitting causing aggravation or precipitating cumulative trauma disorders such as tendinis numbness of hands, carpal tunnel syndrome, and epicondylitis. ABATEMENT METHODS: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is the implementation of a comprehensive ergonomics management program consisting of the following four elements: 1. Worksite analysis: to recognize and identify existing ergonomic risk factors in the workplace. This analysis should include development and use of an ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire. Periodic surveys of the workplace shall be conducted at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employees participation in the ergonomic program shall be required. 2. Medical Management: which includes an accurate recordkeeping system for tracking cumulative trauma disorders. A medical management program shall be established under the guidance of an appropriately qualified medical expert. The program should include the following elements in order to prevent and/or limit the severity of CTDs: A. The health care providers such as the nurse, replacement nurses and contract physicians shall be trained in the early recognition, evaluation, treatment, rehabilitation, and prevention of CTDs, OSHA recordkeeping requirements and physical assessment of employees. B. Health care providers shall perform workplace walkthroughs which will allow the identification of potential light duty jots, and the direct observation of individual work practices in order to remain knowledgeable about operations described by employees. This should be done monthly or as jobs change and shall be documented. C. A written ergonomic classification of jobs describing the various ergonomic hazards found on each job shall be developed and made available to the health car providers. The employees in the health department shall provide input to the development of this list. Periodic review and revision of the ergonomic classification list shall be conducted particularly when jobs change. D. A CTD surveillance shall be performed in order to identify jobs needing intervention to eliminate ergonomic hazards. Surveillance can be passive, by reviewing data such as illness records and/or active, through an employee symptom survey. Health car providers will provide input in this surveillance to identify high risk departments, production lines, or jobs. E. A CTD evaluation shall be done to identify individuals with a mild CTD, allowing early treatment to limit the conditions; severity. The health care provider should perform a CTD evaluation of employees assigned to jobs with known ergonomic hazards or areas found to have CTD problems by surveillance. The CTD evaluation should consist of a medical and occupational history, physical requirements of the work and work process, and brief non-invasive physical examination and shall be documented. F. Evaluation and treatment of employees with complaints consistent with CTD's shall be based on protocols involving the history and physical examination. Written protocols for health surveillance for the evaluation, treatment and follow-up of workers with signs and symptoms of CTDs should be used. These protocols should be reviewed and updated at least annually. Conservative medical treatment shall be followed for initial symptoms and treatment, in order to prevent increased morbidity of CTD cases. If initial treatment of the CTD has not resulted in improvement or resolution of the symptoms, the employee shall be taken off the job causing the problem, or placed on restrictions by the health care provider. The restricted employee will be placed on appropriate jobs consistent with their capability by health care provider. The restricted employee will be placed on appropriate jobs consistent with their capability by health care providers familiar with the job requirements. Symptomatic employees shall be followedup to determine the effectiveness of the prescribed treatment. Employees with severe symptoms, positive physical findings or disorders resistant to treatment shall be referred to a physician for further evaluation. Conservative therapy and time away from the job causing the problem deserves an adequate trial before surgical intervention in contemplated. Referrals to outside medical persons shall be make only to persons competent to diagnose and treat CTDs. Recommendations for surgery should be referred for a second opinion to a physician other than a surgeon. Appropriate amount of time off work after surgery shall be assured. A physical evaluation of the worker after time away from work, to assess work capabilities should be performed to ensure appropriate job placement upon return to work. If the employee is being medically followed for CTDs the medical department will review the ergonomic analysis on the job causing the problems. If a job has no ergonomic analysis available, the job will be analyzed for ergonomic stressors. G. The health care providers shall be responsible for entering the appropriate information onto the OSHA forms and thus should be appropriately and adequately trained on OSHA's recordkeeping requirements. H. Evaluation of the medical management program should be performed on a periodic basis to assure effectiveness of all of the elements and to reflect changes in state-of-the-art treatment. The program should address early recognition, evaluation, and referral of cumulative trauma disorder cases and should include conservation treatment and conservative return to work. Systematic worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the program. 3. Training and education: for exposed employees, including methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training, shall be provided. Retraining should be done annually or as operations change. Training should address hazards associated with the job, the risks of developing cumulative trauma disorders, symptoms of exposure, and how to prevent the occurrence of cumulative trauma disorders. This training shall include proper adjustment of work station equipment and initial orientation and hands-on job training. To facilitate the early detection and reporting of CTDs, plant management personnel, shall be educated on causes and early symptoms and signs of CTDs. Employees will be encouraged to report early symptoms. Disincentives for employee reporting shall be avoided. A supervisors training program should also be implemented to allow recognition of the sings of cumulative trauma disorders and to reinforce the supervisor's active involvement in the ergonomics program. The training program should include the establishment's health care providers to ensure that they are able to recognize and prescribe appropriate treatment for cumulative trauma disorders. The health care providers shall have input in the overall ergonomics program with particular emphasis on the recognition, evaluation and treatment of CTDs. 4. Hazard prevention and control: including engineering, work practice, and administrative controls, and personal protective equipment where relevant, shall be implemented. A. Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of exposure to ergonomic stress. These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, and preventive maintenance of related equipment. Personal protective equipment shall be evaluated to determine relief of ergonomic stress. (NOTE: Splints should not be used during work activities unless it has been determined by a health care provider or ergonomist that on wrist deviation, bending, or rotation is necessary to perform the job task.) A work hardening program should be implemented to gradually increase workers' sewing time up to full shift. Job/task rotation should be designed to vary the distribution and frequency of musculoskeletal activity. The work-break schedule should be reevaluated with consideration give to more frequent, shorter brakes. The necessity of the current rate incentive system should be re-evaluated. B. Work practice controls are implemented which include proper work techniques: conditioning for new employees, transferred employees and employees returning from prolonged absences, (shutdown); and monitoring and modifications as necessary to minimize ergonomic stressors. C. Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergonomist and may include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and use of mechanical lifts. The goal of this program should be to make the job fit the person. At both the research and development and design engineering phases, a careful analysis of cost/performance effectiveness should be made. a total productivity assessment should be done at all phases of the technology cycle. The sewing chairs should be replaced with adjustable ergonomically-designed chair on coasters. the height of workstations should be adjustable and sit-stand option considered. All workstation surfaces should be smooth and edges rounded. Ergonomically designed scissors should replace the existing conventional scissors. Materials handling should be re-engineered to reduce being, twisting and lifting motions. MUTLT-STEP ABATEMENT SCHEDULE STEP 1: Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite analysis, medical management, and training and education, as detailed in items 1-3 above. STEP 2: Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work practice, and engineering controls as detailed in items 4(a) - 4(c). ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS. SIXTY (60) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD CONSISTENT WITH THE DATES REQUIRED BY THIS CITATION. STEP 3: Abatement shall have been completed by implementation of feasible engineering or administrative controls, as described in items 4(a)
1910.38 A01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1993
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $875 · Current $875
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1993
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $525 · Current $525
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1993
- Abate by
- Jan 8, 1993
- Penalty
- Initial $350 · Current $350
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1993
- Abate by
- Jan 8, 1993
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1993
- Abate by
- Jan 8, 1993
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1993
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 1993
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1993
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 1993
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Jan 7, 1993
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 1993
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jan 5, 1993
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 1993
1910.147 C05 I
- Issued
- Jan 5, 1993
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 1993
More inspections at U. S. Sack Corporation
View U. S. Sack Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 100745231.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.