MONTVILLE, CT —
OSHA Inspection: RAND-WHITNEY ROBERTSON CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RAND-WHITNEY ROBERTSON CORPORATION in ROUTE 163, MONTVILLE, CT 06352 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 100774546.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RAND-WHITNEY ROBERTSON CORPORATION
- Site address
- ROUTE 163
- City
- MONTVILLE
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06352
- Mailing
- BOX 38, ROUTE 163, MONTVILLE, CT 06352
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2621
- Employees
- 200
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- May 31, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $800 · Current $525 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to repetitive upper extremity body motion resulting in stress likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders: GLUING DEPARTMENT: EMPLOYEES WHO WORKED IN THIS DEPARTMENT WERE EXPOSED TO: A) GRIP FORCES, REPETITIVE HAND AND WRIST MOTIONS AND AWKWARD BODY POSTURES WHICH CAUSED UPPER EXTREMITY CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS INCLUDING CARPEL TUNNEL SYNDROME, TENDONITIS AND GANGLION. B) FREQUENT REPETITION OF MANUAL MATERIAL HANDLING WITH TORSO TWISTING DURING LIFTING BODY POSITIONS THAT RESULTED IN LOWER BACK INJURIES. WHILE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR HAZARD CORRECTION RESTS ON THE EMPLOYER, SOME FEASIBLE METHODS TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS OR REDUCE THE HAZARDS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: STACKERS: 1) TRAIN EMPLOYEES TO WAIT FOR MATERIALS TO COME TO THEM. REACHING TO PULL MATERIALS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO 16-17 INCHES OR LESS. 2) TRAIN EMPLOYEES TO MOVE ALONG THE CONVEYOR. THIS WOULD ENABLE THEM TO POSITION THEIR BODIES IN FRONT OF THE MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED, THUS MINIMIZING BODY TWISTS. 3) SHORTEN THE CONVEYOR. THIS ALLOWS THE EMPLOYEE TO STAND AT THE END WHERE THE PRODUCT CAN BE DELIVERED TO THE EMPLOYEE ELIMINATING THE NEED TO REACH. 4) UTILIZE ADJUSTABLE PACKING STANDS SO EMPLOYEES DO NOT REACH UP AND OVER THE EDGE OF THE BOX TO PLACE MATERIALS INTO PACKING BOXES. BOTH HEIGHT AND ANGLE SHOULD BE ADJUSTABLE. IT IS ALSO ADVANTAGEOUS TO HAVE THE STANDS MOVABLE, MINIMIZING THE DISTANCE BETWEEN PICKUP AND DELIVERY POINTS. 5) DESIGN A CLAMPING DEVICE TO SECURE MATEIRALS WHILE THEY ARE BEING PACKED INTO SHIPPING BOXES. THIS ELIMINATED THE PINCH GRIP WORK. 6) INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF ADJUSTABLITY OF THE PACK OFF STAND. THIS ALLOWS GREATER ACCESS TO EMPLOYEES AND MINIMIZES THE AMOUNT OF HAND MANIPULATION REQUIRED DURING PACKING. 7) EDUCATE EMPLOYEES ON THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTAINING NEUTRAL WRIST POSITIONS WHILE PERFORMING REPETITIVE MOTIONS. 8) MORE FREQUENT ROTATION OF EMPLOYEES TO ALTERNATE WORKSTATIONS. FEEDERS: 1) INSTALL A LIFT DEVICE TO RAISE AND LOWER PALLETS CONTAINING RAW MATERIALS. THIS ELIMINATES EXCESSIVE TORSO FLEXING. GENERALLY, TORSO FLEXING SHOULD BE LIMITED TO 6-10 DEGREES FROM VERTICAL. 2) STACK LOADS ON PALLETS AT LEVELS WHERE THE EMPLOYEES AVOID REACHING ABOVE STRESSFULL HEIGHTS. HEIGHTS SHOULD ALLOW ACCESS WITHOUT THE HAND BEING RAISED ABOVE SHOULDER LEVEL OR THE ELBOW BEING RAISED ABOVE MID TORSO. 3) REDESIGN THE FEED MACHINES TO PULL MATERIAL FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE STACK. ADDITIONAL FEED STOCK SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE TOP OF THE STACK. 4) WAIT UNTIL ALL MATERIAL HAS FED THROUGH THE MACHINE BEFORE ADDING MOVE STOCK. THIS ALSO ELIMINATES THE NEED TO LIFT THE MATERIAL ALREADY ON THE MACHINE EACH TIME NEW STOCK HAS TO BE ADDED. 5) USE TWO EMPLOYEES TO FEED EACH MACHINE. ONE LIFTS THE STOCK WHILE THE OTHER ADDS STOCK UNDERNEATH. 6) TRAIN EMPLOYEES TO MOVE AROUND PALLETS OR SLIDE THE PRODUCT TO GET IT CLOSER TO HIS/HER BODY TO GAIN BETTER ACCESS AND MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE DURING LIFTING. 7) EDUCATE THE EMPLOYEE ON THE BASICS OF BODY BIOMECHANICS AND THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTAINING THE WRIST IN AN ERGONOMICALLY NEUTRAL POSITION. ABATEMENT SCHEDULE STEP 1 - SUBMIT TO THE AREA DIRECTOR A WRITTEN DETAILED PLAN OF ABATEMENT OUTLINING A SCHEDULE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ENGINEERING AND/OR ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES TO CONTROL EMPLOYEE EXPOSURE TO THE TRAUMA CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DISORDERS REFERENCED IN THIS CITATION. THE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, TARGET DATES FOR THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS WHICH MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ABATEMENT DATES REQUIRED BY THIS CITATION. A) EVALUATION OF THE EXTENT AND LOCATION OF THE HAZARD SOURCE. B) EVALUATION OF CONTROL MEASURE OPTIONS. C) SELECTION OF OPTIMUM CONTROL MEASURE(S). D) DETERMINATION OF CONTROL MEASURE DESIGN. E) ORDERING AND DELIVERY OF ANY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS. F) INSTALLATION OF CONTROL MEASURES. G) TRAINING OF EMPLOYEES IN: 1) JOB(S) WHERE THE POTENTIAL FOR REPETITIVE MOTION INJURIES EXIST 2) ERGONOMIC METHOD(S) OF HOLDING AND HANDLING MATERIALS AND AND PERFORMING REQUIRED WORK; AND 3) PROPER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NEWLY IMPLEMENTED CONTROL MEASURES. H) ASSURANCE OF EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE OF CONTROL MEASURES. ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE EVALUATED BY A TECHNICALLY QUALIFIED PERSON. PROGRESS REPORT(S) ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. STEP 2 - CORRECTION SHALL BE COMPLETED BY IMPLEMENTATION OF FEASIBLE ENGINEERING AND/OR ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND THEIR EFFECTIVENESS AT ACHIEVING COMPLIANCE VERIFIED.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $525.00
- — I (S) $560.00
- — Z (S) $800.00
1910.36 B04
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $200 · Current $105 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $105.00
- — I (S) $140.00
- — Z (S) $200.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $385 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $385.00
- — I (S) $420.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $500 · Current $315 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $315.00
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $500.00
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $500 · Current $315 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $315.00
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $500.00
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $595 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $595.00
- — I (S) $630.00
- — Z (S) $900.00
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $500 · Current $595
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $595.00
- — I (S) $630.00
- — Z (S) $500.00
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 1990
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $455 Reduced
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $455.00
- — I (S) $490.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1904.2 A02
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $100 · Current $50 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $50.00
- — Z (O) $100.00
1910.303 F
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 1990
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 1990
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 1990
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Dec 12, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $1,400 · Current $700 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $700.00
- — Z (R) $1400.00
More inspections at Rand-Whitney Robertson Corporation
View Rand-Whitney Robertson Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 100774546.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.