SPRINGFIELD, MO —
OSHA Inspection: ONCOLOGY/HEMATOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF SPRINGFIELD
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ONCOLOGY/HEMATOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF SPRINGFIELD in 1900 SOUTH NATIONAL AVENUE, SUITE 3600, SPRINGFIELD, MO 65804 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 100879360.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ONCOLOGY/HEMATOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF SPRINGFIELD
- Site address
- 1900 SOUTH NATIONAL AVENUE, SUITE 3600
- City
- SPRINGFIELD
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 65804
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8011
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $810 · Current $810
General-duty citation text
SECTION 5(A)(1) OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970: THE EMPLOYER DID NOT FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND A PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT WHICH WERE FREE FROM RECOGNIZED HAZARDS THAT WERE CAUSING OR LIKELY TO CAUSE DEATH OR SERIOUS PHYSICAL HARM TO EMPLOYEES IN THAT HEALTH CARE WORKERS WERE EXPOSED TO THE HAZARD OF BEING POTENTIALLY INFECTED BY HBV AND/OR HIV THROUGH DIRECT CONTACT WITH BLOOD OR OTHER BODY FLUIDS: A) EXAM ROOMS #1 - #8: IN THAT NURSES AND LAB TECHNICIANS CARRIED LINEN SOILED WITH BODY FLUIDS FROM THE EXAM ROOMS, WHERE THE LINEN WAS USED, THROUGH PATIENT-CARE AREAS AND BACK TO THE LAUNDRY ROOM WITHOUT BAGGING THE SOILED LINEN PRIOR TO TRANSPORT. B) CHEMOTHERAPY AREA: IN THAT NURSES CARRIED LINEN SOILED WITH BODY FLUIDS FROM THE CHEMOTHERAPY TREATMENT STATIONS, WHERE THE LINEN WAS USED, THROUGH PATIENT-CARE AREAS AND BACK TO THE LAUNDRY ROOM WITHOUT BAGGING THE SOILED LINEN PRIOR TO TRANSPORT. C) LABORATORY: IN THAT NURSES AND LAB TECHNICIANS WORE LAB COATS SOILED WITH BODY FLUIDS OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY AND LAUNDERED THE SOILED LAB COATS AT HOME. WHILE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTING THE HAZARD RESTS WITH THE EMPLOYER, GIVEN HIS/HER SUPERIOR KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORKPLACE, FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE METHODS TO CORRECT THE HAZARD IDENTIFIED IN INSTANCES (A), (B), AND (C), AMONG OTHERS ARE: 1) THE IC PROGRAM SHALL HAVE INDENTIFIED ALL LAUNDRY OPERATIONS INVOLVING SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF DIRECT EXPOSURE TO BODY FLUIDS. LINEN SOILED WITH BODY FLUIDS SHALL BE HANDLED AS LITTLE AS POSSIBLE AND WITH MINIMUM AGITATION TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF THE PERSON HANDLING THE LINEN. ALL SOILED LINEN SHALL BE BAGGED AT THE LOCATION WHERE IT WAS USED: IT SHALL NOT BE SORTED OR RINSED IN PATIENT-CARE AREAS. SOILED LINEN SHALL BE PLACED AND TRANSPORTED IN BAGS THAT PREVENT LEAKAGE. THE BAGS MUST BE TAGGED OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED AS CONTAINING ARTICLES CONTAMINATED WITH POTENTIALLY INFECTIOUS MATERIAL. D) EXAM ROOMS #1 -#8: IN THAT NURSES AND LAB TECHNICIANS CARRIED ARTICLES CONTAMINATED WITH BODY FLUIDS FROM THE EXAM ROOMS, WHERE THE ARTICLES WERE USED, THROUGH PATIENT-CARE AREAS AND BACK TO THE LABORATORY OR CHEMOTHERAPY AREA FOR DISPOSAL WITHOUT BAGGING THE CONTAMINATED ARTICLES PRIOR TO TRANSPORT. WHILE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTING THE HAZARD RESTS WITH THE EMPLOYER, GIVEN HIS/HER SUPERIOR KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORKPLACE, FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE METHODS TO CORRECT THE HAZARD IDENTIFIED IN INSTANCE (D) AMONG OTHERS ARE: 1) OBJECTS THAT ARE CONTAMINATED WITH POTENTIALLY INFECTIOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE PLACED IN AN IMPERVIOUS BAG AT THE LOCATION WHERE THEY WERE USED. IF OUTSIDE CONTAMINATION OF THE BAG IS LIKELY, A SECOND BAG SHALL BE ADDED. THE BAGS MUST BE TAGGED OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED AS CONTAINING ARTICLES CONTAMINATED WITH POTENTIALLY INFECTIOUS MATERIAL. E) IN THAT APPROPRIATE MEDICAL FOLLOW-UP PROCEDURES AFTER POSSIBLE HIV/HBV EXPOSURE INCIDENTS WERE NOT IMPLEMENTED FOR HEALTH CARE WORKERS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PHYSICIANS NURSES AND LAB TECHNICIANS WHO WERE ENGAGED IN PROCEDURES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PERFORMING AND ASSISTING WITH INVASIVE PROCEDURES, DRAWING BLOOD, PREPARING AND PROCESSING SPECIMANS, PREPARING AND ADMINISTERING CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENTS, AND HANDLING INFECTIOUS WASTES. WHILE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTING THE HAZARD RESTS WITH THE EMPLOYER, GIVEN HIS/HER SUPERIOR KNOWLEDE OF THE WORKPLACE, FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE METHODS TO CORRECT THE HAZARD IDENTIFED IN INSTANCE (E) AMONG OTHERS ARE: 1) IMPLEMENTATION OF FOLLOW-UP PROCEDURES AFTER POSSIBLE EXPOSURE TO HIV OR HBV: A) IF A HEALTH CARE WORKER HAS A PERCUTANEOUS (NEEDLE-STICK OR CUT) OR MUCOUS MEMBRANE (SPLASH TO EYE, NASAL MUCOSA, OR MOUTH) EXPOSURE TO BODY FLUIDS OR HAS A CUTANEOUS EXPOSURE TO BLOOD WHEN THE WORKER'S SKIN IS CHAPPED, ABRADED, OR OTHERWISE NONINTACT, THE SOURCE PATIENT SHALL BE INFORMED OF THE INCIDENT AND TESTED FOR HIV AND HBV INFECTIONS, AFTER CONSENT IS OBTAINED. B) IF PATIENT CONSENT IS REFUSED OR IF THE SOURCE PATIENT TESTS POSITIVE, THE HEALTH CARE WORKER SHALL BE EVALUATED CLINICALLY AND BY HIV ANTIBODY TESTING AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AND ADVISED TO REPORT AND SEEK MEDICAL EVALUATION OF ANY ACUTE FEBRILE ILLNESS THAT OCCURS WITHIN 12 WEEKS AFTER EXPOSURE. HIV SERONEGATIVE WORKERS SHALL BE RETESTED 6 WEEKS POST-EXPOSURE AND ON A PERIODIC BASIS THEREAFTER (12 WEEKS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER EXPOSURE). C) NO FURTHER FOLLOW-UP OF A HEALTH CARE WORKER EXPOSED TO INFECTION AS DESCRIBED ABOVE IS NECESSARY IF THE SOURCE PATIENT IS SERONEGATIVE UNLESS THE SOURCE PATIENT IS AT HIGH RISK OF HIV INFECTION. IN THE LATTER CASE, A SUBSEQUENT SPECIMAN (E.G., 12 WEEKS FOLLOWING EXPOSURE) MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE HEALTH CARE WORKERS FOR ANTIBODY TESTING. D) FOLLOW-UP PROCEDURES SHALL BE TAKEN FOR HEALTH CARE WORKERS EXPOSED, OR POTENTIALLY EXPOSED, TO HBV. THE TYPES OF PROCEDURES DEPENDS ON THE IMMUNIZATION STATUS OF THE WORKER (I.E., WHETHER HBV VACCINATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND ANTIBODY RESPONSE IS ADEQUATE) AND THE HBV SEROLOGIC STATUS OF THE SOURCE PATIENT. THE CDC IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE HAS PUBLISHED ITS RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING HBV POSTEXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS IN TABLE FORMAT IN JUNE 17, 1985, MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT. E) IF AN EMPLOYEE REFUSES TO SUBMIT TO THE PROCEDURES IN (B), (C), OR (D) ABOVE WHEN SUCH PROCEDURES ARE MEDICALLY INDICATED, NO ADVERSE ACTION CAN BE TAKEN ON THAT GROUND ALONE SINCE THE PROCEDURES ARE DESIGNED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE EXPOSED EMPLOYEE. F) IN THAT TRAINING ON "UNIVERSAL PRECAUTIONS" WAS NOT PROVIDED FOR HEALTH CARE WORKERS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PHYSICIANS, NURSES AND LAB TECHNICIANS WHO WERE ENGAGED IN PROCEDURES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PERFORMING AND ASSISTING WITH SPECIMENS, PREPARING AND AMINISTERING CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENTS, AND HANDLING INFECTIOUS WASTES. WHILE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRECTING THE HAZARD RESTS WITH THE EMPLOYER, GIVEN HIS/HER SUPERIOR KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORKPLACE, FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE METHODS TO CORRECT THE HAZARD INDENTIFIED IN INSTANCE (F), AMONG OTHERS ARE: 1) IMPLEMENTATION OF A TRAINING AND EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR ALL HIGH RISK HEALTH CARE WORKERS: A) THEY SHALL RECEIVE EDUCATION ON PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, MODES OF TRANSMISSION AND PREVENTION OF HIV/HBV. HEALTH CARE WORKERS SHALL BE COUNSELED REGARDING POSSIBLE RISKS TO THE FETUS FROM HIV/HBV AND OTHER ASSOCIATED INFECTIOUS AGENTS. B) IN ADDITION, SUCH HIGH RISK WORKERS MUST RECEIVE TRAINING REGARDING THE LOCATION AND PROPER USE OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT. THEY SHALL BE TRAINED CONCERNING PROPER WORK PRACTICES AND, IF THE FACILITY HAS IMPLEMENTED THEM, SHALL UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF "UNIVERSAL PRECAUTIONS" AS IT APPLIES TO THEIR WORK PRACTICES. THEY SHALL BE TRAINED ABOUT THE MEANING OF COLOR CODING OR OTHER METHODS (EXCEPT TAGS) USED TO DESIGNATE CONTAMINATED ARTICLES OR INFECTIOUS WASTE. WHERE TAGS ARE USED, TRAINING ABOUT TAGS AND PRECAUTIONS TO BE USED IN HANDLING CONTAMINATED ARTICLES OR INFECTIOUS WASTE IS GOVERNED BY 29 CFR 1910.145(F). WORKERS SHALL RECEIVE TRAINING ABOUT PROCEDURES TO BE USED IF THEY ARE EXPOSED TO NEEDLESTICK OR TO BODY FLUIDS.
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Dec 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $640 · Current $640
1910.145 F08 I
- Issued
- Dec 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $640 · Current $640
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Dec 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Dec 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Dec 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1910.1450 F02
- Issued
- Dec 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 1991
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Dec 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 1990
1910.20 G01 I
- Issued
- Dec 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 1991
1910.20 G01 II
- Issued
- Dec 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 1991
1910.20 G01 III
- Issued
- Dec 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 1991
1910.20 G02
- Issued
- Dec 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 1991
More inspections at Oncology/Hematology Associates of Springfield
View Oncology/Hematology Associates of Springfield's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 100879360.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.