BUFFALO, MO —
OSHA Inspection: PETIT JEAN POULTRY INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of PETIT JEAN POULTRY INC. in HWY 73 AND RAMSEY ST., BUFFALO, MO 65622 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 100894922.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PETIT JEAN POULTRY INC.
- Site address
- HWY 73 AND RAMSEY ST.
- City
- BUFFALO
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 65622
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 140, BUFFALO, MO 65622
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2015
- Employees
- 300
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
25 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.20 E02 IIA
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $300.00
- — Z (S) $300.00
1910.20 G02
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.38 A01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $200 · Current $200
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $200.00
- — Z (S) $200.00
1910.38 A05 III
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.120 Q01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $300.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $100.00
- — Z (S) $400.00
1910.134 F02 I
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $300.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.134 F02 II
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $200.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.178 N08
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $700
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $700.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $200.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1200 F08
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $10,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform repetitive motions resulting in stressors likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders: ITEM A - LEG DEBONER who repeatedly performs tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (ulnar deviation and flexion of right wrist and abduction of right shoulder while cutting, excessive pinch grip force with left hand and ulnar deviation of left wrist while holding piece during cutting and while pulling skin off) was exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in musculoskeletal disorders, on or about April 17, 1990, and the preceding two calendar years. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Use machine to do all skin removal. 2) Make sure honing steel accessible to each operator when needed. 3) Ensure that operators are working at the correct height. 4) Divide the job into two separate tasks, with the first task to include the deboning cuts (except the final bone removal) with a bio-curve knife. 5) Provide a gripping device to assist in holding the meat while the bone is cut away. 6) Job rotation is needed. 7) Provide knives with edge beveled on both sides. ITEM B - LEG TRIMMER who repeatedly performs tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (excessive pinch grip forces required when cutting with dulled scissors) was exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in musculoskeletal disorders, on or about April 17, 1990, and the preceding two calendar years. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Provide high quality scissors which can be sharpened and will hold an edge after extended use. 2) Provide at least two pair of scissors at each position. 3) Make honing steel accessible to each operator when needed. 4) Use job rotation. 5) Ensure that operators are working at the correct height. ITEM C - THIGH DEBONER who repeatedly performs tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (ulnar deviation during most of the cuts) was exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in musculoskeletal disorders, on or about April 17, 1990, and the preceding two calendar years. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Provide bio-curved knife. 2) Job rotation should be used. 3) Ensure that operators are working at the correct height. ITEM D - THIGH TRIMMER who repeatedly performs tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (excessive pinch grip forces required when cutting with dulled scissors and ulnar deviations of wrist of cutting hand due to the fixed position of the piece of meat) was exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in musculoskeletal disorders, on or about April 17, 1990, and the preceding two calendar years. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Provide high quality scissors which can be sharpened and will hold an edge after extended use. 2) Provide at least two pair of scissors at each position. 3) Make honing steel accessible to each operator when needed. 4) Use job rotation. 5) Ensure that operators are working at the correct height. 6) Train operators to hold the piece to be trimmed, respositioning it for each cut so as to eliminate the wrist deviations. 7) Deliver pieces via a flat conveyor, which requires the piece to be picked up and held while trimming is done. ITEM E - QC INSPECTOR (THIGH LINE) who repeatedly performs tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (extreme extension and ulnar deviation of both wrists and hands, and wrists are in contact with cold meat during most of the work cycle) was exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in musculoskeletal disorders, on or about April 17, 1990, and the preceding two calendar years. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but not be limited to: 1) Reorient box (tilted up) and have worker pull the thighs from the box into another box. 2) Deliver the thighs onto a table and provide a drop delivery for worker to pull thighs into box as they are inspected. 3) Combine final inspection with line inspection. ITEM F - SKIN PULLER who repeatedly performs tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (ulnar deviation of both wrists, excessive pinch grip force in both hands and left shoulder abduction) was exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in musculoskeletal disorders, on or about April 17, 1990, and the preceding two calendar years. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Use skin removing machine. 2) Provide a gripping device to hold piece while skin is pulled off. 3) Provide a pneumatic tool for pulling the skin. 4) Ensure that operators are working at the correct height. 5) Job rotation is needed. ITEM G - SKIN LOADER (LEG LINE) who repeatedly performs tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (lifting weight in excess of allowable limits established by NIOSH) was exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in musculoskeletal disorders, on or about April 17, 1990, and the preceding two calendar years. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Provide overhead mechanical hoist. 2) Place pallet on scissor lift so boxes can be moved directly from the pallet to the skiner table without being lifted. 3) Train operators to lift boxes properly. ITEM H - SKIN LOADER (THIGH LINE) who performs tasks which requires various ergonomic stresses (lifting weight in excess of allowable limits established by NIOSH) was exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in musculoskeletal disroders, on or about April 17, 1990, and the preceding two calendar years. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Provide overhead mechanical hoist. 2) Place pallet on scissor lift so boxes can be moved directly from the pallet to the skinner table without being lifted. 3) Train operators to lift boxes properly. ABATEMENT SCHEDULE STEP #1: Effective administrative controls, such as employee training, physical assessment, job rotation, etc., shall be provided as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering or permanent admininstrative control can be implemented which will reduce employee exposure to nominal risk. This may involve reduced line speed or piece rate to decrease the amount of repetitiv motion work per employee. STEP #2: Submit to the Area Director, a written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposures to musculoskeletal disorders referenced in this citation and to insure that musculoekeletal disorder problems are dealt with properly in the future. The plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation: a) Development, testing, and implementation of ergonomic methods to control employee exposure to musculoskeletal disorders in the jobs referenced in this citation. This will include: 1) Evaluation of the extent and location of the hazard source; 2) Evaluation of engineering/administrative control options; 3) Selection of optimum control method(s); 4) Reduction of the line speed or piece rate to decrease the amount of repetitive motion per employee; 5) Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls; 6) Finalization of control measure design; 7) Ordering and delivery of equipment and materials; 8) Installation of control measures; 9) Assurance of effective performance of control measures by monitoring the effects of musculoskeletal disorders on changed jobs. b) Implementation of a work place education and awareness program which should include the following elements: 1) Instruction of employees in proper job task method(s) and the importance of musculoskeletal health and prevention of illnesses and injuries. 2) Training of managers and engineers to understand the causes and means to prevent repetitive motion and stress illnesses. Specificially this %% should include: 1) The causes of and solutions to musculoskeletal disorders; 2) Job(s) where the potential for repetitive motion injuries exist; 3) Ergonomic methods of task and work station design; 4) Proper operations and maintenance of newly implemented control measures. c) Implementation of an ergonomic surveillance, evaluation, and modification program which should include the following elements: 1) Develop a tracking program to identify jobs associated with musculoskeletal disorders to prevent successive or repeated repetitive motion injury on the same jobs. 2) Perform an ergonomic assessment and redesign of each operation identified in the tracking program to identify stressors which may be produce by the environment, tools, work station design, or work methods and to provide solutions which will eliminate or significantly reduce the stresses. 3) Implementation of an employees rotation program which assures all employees an equitable task distribution. 4) Implementation of a light-duty program. All proposed control measures shall be evaluated for each particular use by a technically qualified ergonomist. Ninety (90) day progress reports are required during the abatement period. The 90-day requirement for the submission or progress reports may be shortened of lenghened by the Area Director depending on the specific circumstances. STEP #3: Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $10000.00
- — Z (W) $10000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Jul 20, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $10,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees who sustained musculoskeletal disorders were exposed to increased risk of aggravation to existing injuries and illnesses and developing further injuries and illnesses: ITEM A - Where there were 678 cases of musculoskeletal disorders, of which 29 cases involved surgery, during the period of November 30, 1987 through February 13, 1990, and the medical management program was deficient in the following areas: 1) Lack of knowledge and instruction of management and production workers about the range of musculoskeletal disorders, means of prevention, causes, early symptoms or treatment of musculoskelal disorders. 2) Lack of a method of surveillance for, and early detection of, musculoskeletal disorders. 3) A philosophy on the part of management that the solution to the problem remains in self-selection of workers who are able to perform the job by terminating workers who develop hand or wrist pain or encouraging then to quit rather than eliminating or reducing the risk of musculoskeletal disorders through engineering or administrative controls. 4) The incentive that this produces for workers to not report symptoms. 5) Production quotas, pay incentives and management pressure that discourages reduced work rates for workers experiencing musculo- skeletal disorder symptoms. 6) Delaying diagnosis and treatment of workers with musculoskeletal disorder symptoms by three days as a matter of policy. 7) There was no tracking program (statistical ergonomic record) for monitoring musculoskeletal disorder trends. 8) Employees returned to their former jobs following medical treatment and time off for musculoskeletal disorders without the work environment having been modified to minimize the risk of reoccurences. In addition, there were no follow-up procedures to assess whether the employee's condition had changed. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible, and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard include but are not limited to: 1) Implement a comprehensive written compliance program including priorities for early detection, treatment, job reassignment and follow-up of musculoskeletal disorders. The program shall include provisions for prompt recognition and evaluation of employee symptoms scheduling procedures for employees to help them recover from musculoskeletal disorders and surgery, and assurance of management's implementation of medical restrictions. This program shall be part of the overall written plan describing how and when each element will be accomplished. The overall plan shall be reviewed and updated quarterly to ensure goals are being met or to identify changes needed. 2) Implement a written program to identify employees developing musculoskeletal disorders, and work methods and work stations causing musculoskeletal disorders. a) Design a baseline symptoms survey to measure, on a plant-wide basis, the extent of employee awareness of their symptoms of work-related disorders. The results of which may be collected and processed by automated process. b) Conduct a plant-wide symptoms survey and repeat it annually to detect any significant change in the incidence, scope, and/or location of reported symptoms. This survey will also help to determine the effectiveness of the overall medical management program and employee job rotation program as related to ergonomics. c) Each quarter the employer shall review medical facility sign-in logs, OSHA-200 forms, and individual employees medical records to monitor musculoskeletal disorder trends in the plant. This analysis shall be completed in addition to the "symptoms survey" in order to monitor trends continuously and substantiate informatin obtained in the annual symptoms survey. d) Compile, and keep current, a written catalog of job activities for each work position. The activity performed at the work position should be described and stressors identified as they affect specific parts of the body such as: physical stress, forces required to exert, posture (twisting, turning, lifting, bending, misalignment of body parts), workstation hardware, repetitiveness of activity, lack of breaks, tool design, training employee turnover. A current catalog is very necessary to establish any "light duty" work positions and have an effective job rotation program. 3) Implement a written medical management protocol for musculoskeletal disorders. All physicians and nurses shall be qualified and trained to use this protocol which will include the following: a) A standardized physical examination, medical history and recording form. The examination will at least include inspection, palpation and range of motion testing and various applicable maneuvers, i.e., Tinel's test, Phalen's test, and Finkelstein's test. b) Specific protocols for the treatment of employees with positive physical signs on examination as well as those with symptoms but no physical signs shall be written and followed. Any symptoms with numbness or crepitus shall be referred to a physican. In addition, employees with positive Tinel's, Phalen's or Finkelstein's tests shall also be referred for physician evaluation. c) Schedule reevaluation in no more than three days after initial report of condition. If the condition worsens further, medical managment should be undertaken without concurrent efforts to reduce the physical stresses of the job by such measures as job modification or work practice changes, administrative changes, etc. A follow-up evaluation shall be scheduled in no more than three days, whether the condition is worsened or unchanged. d) A protocol will be directed by a physician and followed by management which will allow sufficient time for the involved muscle/tendon/nerve group to heal. This shall include time off work, or transfer to another job which allows the affected muscle/tendon/nerve group to rest. Employees shall be evaluated by a physician to assess their capability to return to work. Upon returning to work, they shall, when directed by a physician, be permitted to recondition the injured muscle/tendon/nerve group by gradual resumption of duties. This should occur in addition to any other prescribed treatments. 4) Develop and implement a training program for the medical staff to include a detailed review of the medical aspects of musculoskeletal disorders, and how to medically evaluate, treat, complete forms and reports, and to properly follow-up. The training shall include recognition of plant job-specific risk factors such as posture, force repetition, vibration, contact nerve pressure, and cold. The additive effect of risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders will be discussed along with an awareness of eliminating those which would aggravate the specific condtions of an employee. Medical personnel, including consultant physicians, will be informed as necessary as to the availability of restricted duty jobs appropriate for an employee with a specific condition. 5) Develop and implement a training program for all supervisors and employees to enable then to recognize early symptoms, the need for proper medical care, and the need to ensure work activities are compatible with employees physical conditions. 6) Conduct baseline surveillance. The purpose of baseline health surveillance is to establish a base against which changes in health status can be evaluated. Workers being assigned to positions involving exposure of a particular body part to repeated biomechanical stress will receive baseline health surveillance. These positions will be identified from the data compiled in the catalog of standard job descriptions. The baseline health surveillance will include a medical and occupational history, and physical examination of the musculoskeletal and nervous systems as they relate to musculoskeletal disorders. The examination should include inspection, palpation, range of motions (active, passice and resisted) and other petinent maneuvers of the upper extremities and back. Examples of the pertinent maneuvers for the hands and wrists include Tinel's test, Phalen's test, and Finkelstein's test. Laboratory tests, X-rays and other diagnostic procedures are not a routine part of the baseline assessment. 7) Analyze restricted duty jobs for musculoskeletal disorder potential. a) This written analysis shall include the procedures used in the performance of each job, including lifting requirements, postures, hand grips and frequency of repetitive motion. Such analysis shall be reduced to written form and provided to nurses, doctors, and supervisory personnel involved in the assignment of light duty jobs. b) When an employee in a job not previously evaluated reports a musculoskeletal disorder to medical personnel, that employee's actual performance of the job shall be evaluated to determine if ergonomic risk factors exist and corrective action is necessary for the work station and work method. 8) Develop a policy to inform employees that they will not be discriminated against because they reasonably request and visit the medical facilities or because they have diagnosed musculoskeletal disorder problems and are undergoing medical rehabilitation. ABATEMENT SCHEDULE STEP #1: First Quarter A) Submit to the Area Director a written compliance program and plan of action outlining a schedule for the implementation of this medical program to identify and control musculoskeletal disorders. Quarterly progress reports updating this program and plan will be submitted to the Area Director until final abatement. B) Design the baseline symptoms survey and complete catalog of job activities. C) Assure employee protection against discrimination. STEP #2: Second Quarter A) Conduct a symptoms survey to identify musculoskeletal disorders. B) Initiate quarterly records review to monitor musculoskeletal disorder trends. C) Implement a medical management protocol. D) Implement medical, supervisory and employee training. E) Initiate analysis of all restricted duty jobs. STEP #3: Third Quarter A) Initiate baseline health surveillance. B) Complete analysis or restricted duty jobs. STEP #4: Fourth Quarter A) Corrective action shall be completed by the implementation of all phases of this medical program.
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $10000.00
- — Z (W) $10000.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (W) $10000.00
1904.2 A02
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (W)
1904.4
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (W)
1904.6
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (W)
1910.134 E03
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $400.00
- — Z (R) $1200.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $400.00
- — Z (R) $1000.00
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Petit Jean Poultry INC.
View Petit Jean Poultry INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 100894922.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.