SALISBURY, MO —
OSHA Inspection: BILTWELL COMPANY, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BILTWELL COMPANY, INC. in 110 EAST 2ND, SALISBURY, MO 65281 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 100895481.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BILTWELL COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 110 EAST 2ND
- City
- SALISBURY
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 65281
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2253
- Employees
- 227
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 21, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 19, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $500 · Current $500
Recent events (2)
- — W (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $500.00
1910.1200 F04 II
- Issued
- Dec 21, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 19, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — W (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Dec 21, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 19, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — W (S)
- — Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 21, 1989
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
5) Few modifications have been made to protect the worker from the work environment. Hot steam is not adequately vented in the pressing tasks. The workers stand on hard concrete floors, or at the time or inclination to fully monitor these changes. Even though these "dampeners" help some, more appropriate hard-concrete dampeners and more appropriate footwear could be furnished to cushion the foot and relieve workplace stresses. 6) Overall, there is a lack of use or understanding of the cues that Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The indicate workplace problems. Two of the most common indicators of workplace problems are employee complaints and worker modified workplaces. Although there was limited interaction with workers, many complaints about injuries were heard, and each complaint was directed at a legitimate workplace issue. For example, pressing operators complained about hot steam exposure, especially during the hot summer months. Worker modified workplaces are the employees' attempt to rectify a bad situation. Every chair is modified with pillows, pads, and/or heavy clothing to make the wooden chairs more comfortable. Scissors used in the cut loop employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was task were heavily padded by the worker the ease the scissors' forces onto the hand and fingers. Some workers using pressing irons place a make-do hand-pad on their palms. 7) There is a poor methods training at Biltwell. Workers are allowed to perform dynamic body jerking while working. Dynamics placed on the human body increase the stresses and forces in most situations 8) Raw material stacks on the operator's thighs are commonplace at Biltwell. Even though this is the best place to put these parts at a few workstations due to the lack of ergonomically designed workstations, a better place can be found. free from recognized hazards that were causing or were likely to cause 9) Bundle product carts are too high. In almost every workstation, workers must deviate their shoulders much too much and much too often. 10) A lack of engineering and administrative controls was seen at Biltwell. In addition to direct ergonomic solutions, job rotation to similar jobs is recommended. It is essential, however, that different biomechanical movements exist at these different workstations. 5) Definitions a) Parts cart - a new concept of carrying bundles of material. death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were On a parts cart, a specified number of items are placed as part of a bundle. Space is provided for the raw materials and the finished product for each consecutive operation. In situations where the piece is long, and sewing occurs at only one end of the garment, the bundles are clamped to the cart on the opposite end of the garment. This significantly eases product handling. b) Adjustable workstation - chairs with an air cylinder and proper lumbar support; tables that are easily adjustable by the operator; and treadles that can move independently of the machine and may require electrical or optical connection rather than a mechanical connection. required to perform repetitive motions resulting in stressors likely To meet our definition of adjustability, the equipment should be to cause cumulative trauma disorders: a) Back Sewing Department - four (4) day shift compo operators who repeatedly perform tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (left wrist ulnar deviations, right and left elbow supinations and pronations, right and left hand finger flexions, high frequency adjustable by the operator in five seconds or less. c) Podium-style workstation - angling the worksurface table so that the front is lower than the back. Whereas most workstations are designed at several inches below the elbow, this workstation is designed so that its angle is at a radius from an angle. d) The recommendation of separating taks between right and left parts is dependent on Biltwell's placement of matching machines near each other (this is not a major task). In conjunction with the specific methods of abatement outlined above, finger pinches by the right and left hands, right and left wrist the following general controls should be implemented to reduce the incidence of cumulative trauma disorders. 1) Reduce line speed or piece rate to decrease the amount of repetitive motion work per employee. 2) Implement administrative controls such as rotation of employees to a job or jobs with different motions and/or with less repetitive motion stress. 3) Institute a formal training program for production workers and supervisors to appraise them of: a) Job(s) where the potential for repetitive motion injuries exist. flexions and extensions, radial deviations to the right wrist, left b) Ergonomic methods of task and work station design. c) Proper operation and maintenance of newly implemented control measures. 4) Develop a tracking program to identify employees with cumulative trauma disorders and establish a program of "restricted duty" to prevent successive or repeated repetitive motion injury to the same employees. 5) Develop a tracking program to identify jobs associated with cumulative trauma disorders and establish a program to prevent successive or repated repetitive motion injury on the same jobs. and right shoulder extensions and abductions, dynamic force and aft ABATEMENT SCHEDULE STEP #1 Effective administrative protection, such as employee training, physical assessment, job rotation, etc., shall be provided as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering or permanent administrative control can be implemented which will reduce employee exposure to nominal risk. This may involve reduced line speed or piece rate to decrease the amount of repetitive motion work per employee. STEP #2 Submit to the Area Director a written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of upper body movements, and back and neck flexions) were exposed to engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposure to cumulative trauma disorders referenced in this citation and to insure that cumulative trauma disorder problems are dealt with properly in the future. The plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation: a) Development, testing, and implementation of ergonomic methods to control exposure to cumulative trauma disorders in the jobs referenced in this citation. This will include: to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorders, on 1) Reduction of the line speed or piece rate to decrease the amount or about October 3 and 4, 1989 and at times prior thereto. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 2, Item 1, Instance (a), While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and of repetitive motion per employee. 2) Evaluation of the extent and location of the hazard source; 3) Evaluation of engineering/administrative control options; 4) Selection of optimum control method(s); 5) Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls; 6) Finalization of control measure design; 7) Ordering and delivery of equipment and materials; 8) Installation of control measures; 9) Assurance of effective performance of control measures by acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are monitoring the effects on cumulative trauma disorders on changed jobs. b) Implementation of a work place education and awareness program which should include the following elements: 1) Instruction of employees in proper job task method(s) and the importance of musculoskeletal health and prevention of illnesses and injuries. 2) Training of managers and engineers to understand the causes and means to prevent repetitive motion and stressillnesses. Specifically this should include: not limited to: 1) The causes of and solutions to cumulative trauma disorders. 2) Job(s) where the potential for repetitive motion injuries exist. 3) Ergonomic methods of task and work station design. 4) Proper operation and maintenance of newly implemented control measures. c) Implementation of an ergonomic surveillance, evaluation, and modification program which should include the following elements: 1) Develop a tracking program to identify jobs associated with cumulative trauma disorders to prevent successive or repeated 1) Present preassembled pants liner parts to the worker to avoid repetitive motion injury on the same jobs. 2) Perform an ergonomic assessment and redesign of each operation identified in the tracking program to identifystressors which may be produced by the environment, tools, work station design, or work methods and to provide solutions which will eliminate or significantly reduce the stresses. 3) Implementation of an employee rotation program which assures all employees an equable task distribution. 4) Implementation of a light-duty program. d) Implementation of a medical surveillance and treatment program for repetitive pinches from putting liner parts together. employees exposed to repetitive motion hazards which includes the following: 1) Identification of all current employees who experience Symptoms generally associated with repetitive motion disorders. 2) Pre-employment examinations with special attention to medial nerve distribution, muscular aberrations and wrist flexibility; including both strength and stamina testing and nerve pace testing along with a review of employee work histories relative to repetitive trauma disorders. 3) Medical examinations and counseling of employees as soon as 2) Bring the worker closer to the sewing head by cutting out the unused symptoms generally associated with repetitive trauma disorders are 3 to 4 inch section of the work table. 3) Lower the pocket parts chute. 4) Redesign the clamp so that it provides a horizontal spread as well as vertical presssure. 5) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable chairs reported. Detailed examinations of each employees' specific work history should be performed, and medical treatment, including ice therapy, and exercise thereapy, should be considered where appropriate. Employees should be alerted to the minimal effectiveness of surgical interventions, especially when returning to a job with high risk factors, and to the use and limitations of wristbands or splints. 4) Medical records should include descriptive diagnosis, specifying which muscles, tendons, and nerves are affected, as well as and/or adjustable worksurfaces and/or adjustable treadles. treatment prescribed. 5) Employees should be prohibited from returning to their former jobs following surgery until the work environment has been modified to the extent that the risk of recurrent injury has been minimized. 6) Follow-up of mild cases of impairment to ensure that medical treatment and job changes have been effective. All proposed control measures shall be evaluated for each particular use by a technically qualified ergonomist. Ninety (90) day progress reports are required during the abatement period. The 90-day requirement for the submission of progress reports b) Back Sewing Department - four (4) day shift inseam operators who of progress reports may be shortened or lengthened by the Area Director depending on the specific circumstances. STEP #3: Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance. repeatedly perform tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (high frequency finger pinches and finger flexions to the right and left hands, right and left shoulder extensions, right and left wrist flexions and extensions, left elbow supinations and pronations, left wrist ulnar deviations, right elbow supinations, right wrist ulnar deviations, and back and neck flexions) were exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorders, on or about October 3 and 4, 1989 and at times prior thereto. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 2, Item 1, Instance (b). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Modify to a sit-stand workstation with a table height at approximately elbow height. 2) Provide a butt rest for each worker. 3) Utilize an angled, podium-type worktable surface. 4) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable chairs and/or adjustable worksurfaces and/or adjustable treadles. c) Back Sewing Department - six (6) day shift seat seam operators who repeatedly perform tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (high frequency finger pinches and finger flexions with force to the left and right hands, right elbow supinations, right wrist ulnar and radial deviations, left shoulder extensions, left wrist flexions and extensions, left elbow pronations and supinations, and back and neck flexions) were exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorders, on or about October 3 and 4, 1989 and at times prior thereto. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 2, Item 1, Instance (c). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Present the pants mirror-imaged to each other. 2) Design a clamping fixture to hold both pants' crotch and seat seam together. 3) Reduce height of finished product stack. 4) Insure consistent methods training. 5) Utilize a clamp to hold the material via (a) clamp entire crotch and back seam so the operator needs no more alignments or (b) key landmarks such as the inseams so the operator makes fewer alignments than is required. 6) If the garment can be adequately clamped, then provide a stand-up or sit-stand workstation. 7) Job rotation. 8) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable chairs and/or adjustable worksurfaces and/or adjustable treadles. d) Back Sewing Department - four (4) day shift blind stitching operators who repeatedly perform tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (high frequency finger pinches and finger flexions to the left and right handes, right elbow supinations and pronations, right wrist flexions and extensions, right thumb flexions, left shoulder extensions and abductions, left wrist flexions and extensions, left elbow supinations, ulnar deviations on the left wrist, and back and neck flexions) were exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorders, on or about October 3 and 4, 1989 and at times prior thereto. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 2, Item 1, Instance (d). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Provide a podium-type, angled workstation. 2) Bring operator closer to the sewing needle. 3) Provide a hand-pressured feeder to allow garment to move synchronous with the sewing needle. 4) Job rotation. 5) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable chairs and/or adjustable worksurfaces and/or adjustable treadles. e) Back Sewing Department - seven (7) day shift final loop tack operator who repeatedly perform tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (right and left wrist flexions and extensions, high frequency left and right hand finger pinches and finger flexions, right and left elbow supinations and pronations, left shoulder abductions, left thumb flexions, ulnar deviations by the left wrist, high frequency left shoulder extension, right wrist ulnar and radial deviations, and flexion by back and neck) were exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorders on or about October 3 and 4, 1989 and at times prior thereto. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 2, Item 1, Instance (e). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Reduce finished product stack height. 2) Develop and utilize a tool that folds and holds each loop as they are sewed. 3) Provide a podium-type, angled workstation. 4) Job rotation. 5) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable chairs and/or adjustable worksurfaces and/or adjustable treadles. f) Back Sewing Department - three (3) day shift right fly operators who repeatedly perform tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (high frequency right and left finger pinches with high forces and finger flexions, right and left wrist flexions and extensions, right and left shoulder extensions, right and left thumb flexions, right and left ulnar and radial deviations, right and left elbow pronations and supinations, and neck and back flexions) were exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorders, on or about October 3 and 4, 1989 and the preceding two calendar years. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 2, Item 1, Instance (f). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Present the pants with the right fly upright and adjacent to the operator. 2) Reduce the height of the finished product stack. 3) Provide a podium-type, angled workstation. 4) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable chairs and/or adjustable worksurfaces and/or adjustable treadles. g) Back Sewing Department - one (1) day shift ditching operator who repeatedly performs tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (high frequency finger right and left finger pinches with high forces and finger flexions, right and left elbow pronations and supinations, right and left wrist radial deviations, right shoulder abductions, left wrist ulnar deviations, left thumb extensions, left shoulder extensions, and neck and back flexions were exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorders, on or about October 3 and 4, 1989 and at times prior thereto. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 2, Item 1, Instance (g). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Provide a hand-pressure feeder on opposite side of sewing machine which moves the garment in synchronization with the sewing machine. 2) Use minimum force required to maintain tautness of trouser. 3) Elevate workstation height. 4) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable chairs and/or adjustable worksurfaces and/or adjustable treadles. h) Back Sewing Department - nine (9) day shift sideseamer operators who repeatedly perform tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (high frequency finger pinches, finger flexions, and wrist flexions and extensions to the right and left hands, left elbow pronations, ulnar deviations to the left wrist, left shoulder extensions, right shoulder abductions, and right elbow supinations and back and neck flexions) were exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorders, on or about October 3 and 4, 1989 and at times prior thereto. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 2, Item 1, Instance (h). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Reduce the height of the stacked pants. 2) Modify to a sit-stand workstation approximately at elbow height. 3) Provide a butt rest for each worker. 4) Utilize an angled table surface (upward and towards the sewing needle). 5) Insure that each bundle has the same orientation. 6) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable chairs and/or adjustable worksurfaces and/or adjustable treadles. i) Back Sewing Department - four (4) day shift front corners operators who repeatedly perform tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (high frequency finger pinches and finger flexions with high grip forces by right and left hands, left wrist flexions, left elbow supination, left shoulder extensions, radial deviations to the left wrist, right elbow pronations and supinations, right wrist and thumb flexions, and flexions by back and neck) were exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorders, on or about October 3 and 4, 1989 and teh preceding two calendar years. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 1, Item 1, Instance (i). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Insure proper and consistent use of the pick. 2) Move the pick closer to the worker. 3) Lower the height of the pick. 4) Insure consistent training (high forces are not required). 5) Use minimum force required in turning the front corner right side in. 6) Move the workers closer to the sewing needle. 7) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable chairs and/or adjustable worksurface and/or adjustable treadles. 8) Job rotation. j) Back Sewing Department - one (1) day shift button sew operator who repeatedly performs tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (high frequency right and left ankle planter flexions, right and left wrist ulnar deviations, right and left wrist flexions and extension, high frequency right and left finger pinches and finger flexions, left elbow supinations and pronations, right shoulder extensions, right elbow pronations and supinations, and neck and back flexions) was exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorders, on or about October 3 and 4, 1989 and at times prior thereto. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 2, Item 1, Instance (j). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Separate the button tasks so that an automatic button feeder can be used for each button type. 2) Until an automatic feeder is available, provide a closer-located chute which allows for the grasping of only one button at a time. 3) Provide an index finger cot with an attached marker. 4) Furnish a saddle fixture to hold the garment while the operator marks the garments. 5) Job rotation. 6) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable chairs and/or adjustable worksurfaces and/or adjustable treadles. k) Back Sewing Department - Two (2) day shift serge back operators who repeatedly perform tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (high frequency right and left hand finger pinches with finger and thumb flexions, right elbow pronations and supinations, right wrist radial deviations, left wrist radial and ulnar deviations, high frequency left wrist flexions and extensions, left elbow supinations, and back and neck flexions) were exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorders, on or about October 3 and 4 1989 and at time prior thereto. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 2, Item 1, Instance (k). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Provide a hand-pressure feeder which moves the garment in synchronization with the sewing needle. 2) Insure consistent methods training. 3) Provide a consistent work table design. 4) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable chairs and/or adjustable worksurfaces and/or adjustable treadles. l) Front Sewing Department - one (1) day shift cording front pocket operator who repeatedly performs tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (right and left elbow supinations, right and left wrist flexions and extensions, high frequency right and left finger pinches with finger flexions, right and left thumb extensions, right wrist radial deviations, left wrist ulnar and radial deviations, left shoulder extensions, and back and neck flexions) was exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorders, on or about October 3 and 4, 1989 and at times prior thereto. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 2, Item 1, Instance (l). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Provide a podium-type, angled workstation. 2) Separate right and left cording front pockets. 3) Use a clamp to position material prior to sewing. 4) Once clamped, utilize an automated or semi-automated sew. 5) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable chairs and/or adjustable worksurfaces and/or adjustable treadles. m) Pressing Department - nine (9) day shift topping press operators who repeatedly perform tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (right and left wrist flexions and extensions, high frequency right and left finger pinching and finger flexions, right and left elbow supinations and pronations, high frequency ankle dorsal flexions, consistent hot steam exposure, and neck and back flexions) were exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorder on or about October 3 and 4, 1989 and at times prior thereto. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 2, Item 1, Instance (m). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Provide larger pads on the top valve handles. 2) Lower the top valve handles. 3) Move the saddle closer to the worker. 4) Adjust foot pedals to eliminate operator from standing on one foot. 5) Provide butt rests. 6) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable worksurfaces. n) Back Sewing Department - seven (7) day shift close back pocket operators who repeatedly perform tasks which require various ergonomic stresses (right and left finger pinches with high forces, right and left finger and thumb flexions, elbow pronations and supinations, right wrist radial and ulnar deviations, right shoulder extensions, left wrist ulnar deviations, left shoulder extensions and abductions, and back and neck flexions) were exposed to ergonomic stresses resulting in cumulative trauma disorders, on or about October 3 and 4, 1989 and at times prior thereto. Note: The following abatement information applies to Citation 2, Item 1, Instance (n). While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Provide angled podium-type workstation. 2) Reduce height of finished product stacks. 3) Job rotation. 4) Eliminate postural constraints of the workplace via adjustable chairs and/or adjustable worksurfaces and/or adjustable treadles. In conjunction with the specific methods of abatement outlined above, the following general information applies to instances (a) - (n) above: GENERAL ERGONOMIC PROGRAM CONCERNS A large concern noted was the general lack of an overall ergonomics program. This type of program has multiple benefits for an organization such as Biltwell Company, Inc. An overall ergonomics program consists of several interrelated components. These include means to anticipate and diagnose problems, the use of medical management program to aid the injured workers, and the judicious use of administrative controls and engineering solutions. Failure to implement such an on-going ergonomics program can result in additional injuries to newly hired workers, increased severity of injuries for those workers who are injured, and continued pain and lost work time for workers whose condition could be improved with proper care and attention. 1) Anticipating and Diagnosing Ergonomics Problems. Anticipating and diagnosing ergonomics problems comes from a combination of in-house and off-site training that leads to the understanding of human performance at the workstite. There are many cues to problem jobs, tasks, tools and equipment, and with training, it is possible to spot these warning signs before injures and illness actually develop. The training should be widespread, including training for managers, supervisors, engineers and line workers. With this training will come the ability to anticipate potential problem areas, and then to diagnose the severity of each. In addition to developing the skills to spot cues to problem areas, the organization needs to track injuries and complaints of biomechanical problems by job. This information will also serve as a guide to point out problems with specific jobs, thus allowing a closer analysis to determine specifically where the ergonomic problems are occurring. 2) Medical Management Programs Medical management programs are useful for tracking injured employees. By carefully monitoring each injured worker, the impact of specific medical interventions and/or job modifications for that worker can be evaluated. Thus the use of medications, wrist splints, heat treatments, light duty and other conservative treatments can be monitored for effectiveness. At the same time, job modifications such as rotation, enlargements, altered tools, improved methods, training and other techniques can be evaluated. This will ensure that the injured employee is, in fact, responding to treatment. 3) Use of Administrative Controls and Engineering Solutions The judicious use of administrative controls and engineering solution is an important facet of an overall ergonomics program as well. Engineering controls provide a long-term solution to each problem with specific hardware changes that alter the job that the person is required to perform. Engineering controls may even automate the job so that workers are no longer required to perform these arduous task. Administrative controls consist of administratively enforced changes to the way in which the job is performed. Administrative controls include job rotation, methods changes, the use of specific tools, training and other similar changes that must be enforced to remain in effect. The coninual monitoring of these changes is the major limitation of administrative controls, since management rarely has to be equally effective by managers not fully versed in ergonomics and safety. The result is that administrative controls are often seen as the desired remedy for ergonomic problems when in fact they are poorly implemented and short lived, thus failing to correc the problem. Thus the judicious use of engineering solutions and administrative controls is an important part of an ergonomics program. The absence of these major elements of an ergonomics program, especially when an organization has experienced high rates of cumulative trauma and whole body injuries and where there are multiple repetitive jobs requiring stressful exertions, is likely to result in increasing injury rates, higher severity of injuries, and on-going injuries that are not healed. 4) General Ergonomic Design Concerns In addition to the specific biomechanical concerns listed for each work position, there are a number of ergonomic concerns that affect many workplaces. These concerns should be evaluated for workplaces across the board, and where possible, implemented. In addition to providing an opportunity to improve a wide number of workplaces, these issues form a general pattern indicating that ergonomics is not widely used within the facility. 1) Workplaces often lack adjustability to fit the wide range of workers expected in the general working population or even of those workers observed in the Biltwell facility. The indicators of poor workplace design are: A) Inadequate adjustablity of worksurface heights. Since Biltwell's worksurface heights are adjustable via cut plywood or 2x4's, the operator can not adjust the height himself/herself. Several maintenance workers are required to change these heights. B) An overarching concern lies with the lack of adjustability for utility workers. C) Lack of adjustable workstations thus forcing the workers to adapt to the workplace rather than adapting the workplace to people. This is especially prevalent in the utility workers' workplaces. D) Inadequate adjustability of treadles. If a workstation's height is changed, the treadle's heights move accordingly; thus, the worker is sometimes forced to use static biomechanical forces to adjust to these treadles. E) Poor tools designs. For example, commercial irons are commonplace in the several pressing workstations in the back sewing department. The iron handle design coupled with the work surface designs makes the operator press with the load of the iron with a constant, near-maximum ulnar deviation to the dominant hand. A simple handle redesign can place the operator's wrist in the neutral position. F) Work surface design and raw materials stacks incompatibility. Many of the tasks analyzed needed the following correction: raw materials alignment. The alignment could clearly be modified with adequate work surfaces. Several recommendations toward the improvement of workstation design state that the raw materials be placed mirror-imaged to each other. This would substantially reduce the number of pinches performed by these operators. 2) There is very poor industrial seating available within the facility. The use of well designed (e.g., ergonomic) chairs would reduce worker biomechanical stresses as well as increasing worker comfort. Seating can take the form of regular chairs, tall (lab bench style) chairs, stools, or even "butt rests" used in the sit- stand position. 3) A large number of trainees for this size of a plant indicates a high turnover rate. 4) Medical mismanagement appears to exist at Biltwell, Inc. Severl Several workers indicated that their complaints were heard but not handled correctly. When a worker complains about a legitimate pain he/she tells the supervisor, the supervisor communicates this to the plant manager, and the plant manager instructs a secretary in the front office to make a doctor's appointment for the "injured" worker. Often the worker does not receive legitimate recognition from management and if a doctor's appointment is made, the worker must continue with his/her work and go to the doctor the next day. At the very least, a licensed nurse should be available at the premises to perform a proper initial diagnosis, provide proper care and aid with medical management.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1000.00
- — Z (W) $10000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 21, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees who sustained cumulative trauma disorders (CTDs) were exposed to increased risk of aggravation to exiting injuries and illnesses and developing further injuries and illnesses: a) Where ther were 94 cases of CTD's of which 25 cases involved surgery, during the period from January 1, 1987 through September 6, 1989, and the medical management program was deficient in the following areas: 1) There was no formal educational process for management and employees regarding CTD's. 2) There were no written procedurs for the handling and disposition of CTD cases as they arise. 3) There was no on-site nurse or physician who could handle multiple responsibilities including ergonomic assessment of CTD symptoms, first-aid situations and OSHA injury and illness recordkeeping. 4) There was no pre-employment medical screening program for CTD's. 5) There was no exercise program to emphasize flexibility and stretching to help limit CTD's. 6) Employee breaks were infrequent and thus not conducive to preventing CTD's. 7) There were no regularly scheduled meetings invovling interactions between management and employees to address safety and health issues. 8) There was no program for the early detection of CTD's. 9) There was no tracking program (statistical ergonomic records) for monitoring CTD trends. 10) Employees returned to their former jobs following medical treatment and time off for CTD's without the work environment having been modified to minimize the risk of reocurrences. In addition, there were no follow-up procedures to assess whether the employee's condition had changed. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include, but are not limited to: 1) Implement a comprehensive written compliance program including priorities for early detection, treatment, job reassignment and follow-up of CTD. The program shall include provisions for prompt recognition and evaluation of employee symptoms, scheduling procedure for employees to help them recover from CTD and surgery, and assurance of management's implementation of medical restrictions. This program shall be part of the overall written plan describing how and when each element will be accomplished. The overall plan shall be reviewed and updated quarterly to ensure goals are being met or to identify changes needed. 2) Implement a written program to identify employees developing CTD, and work methods and work stations causing CTD. a) Design a baseline symptoms survey to measure, on a plant-wide basis, the extent of employee awareness of their symptoms of work-related disorders. The results of which may be collected and processed by automated process. b) Conduct a plant wide symptoms survey and repeat it annually to detect any significant change in the incidence, scope, and/or location of reported symptoms. This survey will also help to determine the effectiveness of the overall medical management program and employees job rotation program as related to ergonomics. c) Each quarter the employer shall review medical facility sign-in logs, OSHA-200 Forms, and individual employee medical records to monitor CTD trends in the plant. This analysis shall be completed in addition to the "symptoms survey" in order to monitor trends continuously and substantiate information obtained in the annual symptoms survey. d) Compile, and keep current, a written catalog of job activities for each work position. The activity performed at the work position should be described and stressors identified as they affect specific parts of the body such as: physical stress, forces required to exert, posture (twisting, turning, lifting, bending, misalignment of body parts), workstation hardware, repetitiveness of activity, lack of breaks, tool design, training, employee turn over. A current catalog is very necessary to establish any "light duty" work positions and have an effective job rotation program. e) Consideration shall be given to the provision of an on-site nurse, part time or full time, who could handle multiple responsibilities including maintenance of injury and illness records, handling first aid treatment, assessment of ergonomics complaints and physician referrals. 3) Implement a written medical management protocol for CTDs. The employer shall ensure that all physicians and nurses shall be qualified and trained to use this protocol which will include the following: a) A standardized physical examination, medical history and recording form. The examination will at least include inspection, palpation and range of motion testing and various applicable maneuvers, i.e., Tinel's test, Phalen's test, and Finkelstein's test. b) Specific protocols for the treatment of employees with positive physical signs on examination as well as those with symptoms but no physical signs shall be written and followed. Any symptoms with numbness or crepitus shall be referred to a physican. In addition, employees with positive Tinel's, Phalen's or Finkelstein's tests shall also be referred for physician evaluation. c) Schedule re-evaluation in no less than three days after initial report of condition. If the condition worsens further, medical management should not be undertaken without concurrent efforts to reduce the physical stresses of the job by such measures as job modification or work practice changes, administrative changes, etc. A follow-up evaluation shall be scheduled in no less than three days whether the condition is worsened or unchanged. d) A protocol will be directed by a physican and followed by management which will allow sufficient time for the involved muscle/tendon/nerve group to heal. This shall include time off work, or transfer to another job which allows the affected muscle/tendon/nerve group to rest. When directed by a physician, employees shall be given sufficient time for the involved muscle/tendon/nerve group to heal. This time off work, or transfer to another job which allows the affected muscle/tendon/nerve group to rest. Employees shall be evaluated by a physician to assess their capability to return to work. Upon returning to work, they shall, when directed by a physician, be permitted to recondition the injured muscle/tendon/ nerve group by gradual resumption of duties. This should occur in addition to any other prescribed treatments. 4) Develop and implement a training program for the medical staff to include a detailed review of the medical aspects of CTD, and how to medically evaluate, treat, complete forms and reports, and to properly follow up. The training shall include recognition of plant job specific risk factors such as posture, force, repetition, vibration, contact nerve pressure, and cold. The additive effect of risk factors for CTD will be discussed along with an awareness of eliminating those which would aggravate the specific condition of an employee. Medical personnel, including consultant physicians, will be informed as necessary as to the availability of light duty jobs appropriate for an employee with a specific condition. 5) Develop and implement a training program for all supervisors and employees to enable them to recognize early symptoms, the need for proper medical care, and the need to ensure work activities are compatible with employees' physical conditions. 6) Conduct baseline health surveillance. The purpose of baseline health surveillance is to establish a base against which changes in health status can be evaluated. Workers being assigned to positions involving exposure of a particular body part to repeated biomechanical stress will receive baseline health surveillance. These positions will be identified from the data compiled in the catalog of standard job descriptions. The baseline health surveillance will include a medical and occupational history, and physical examination of the musculoskeletal and nervous systems as they relate to CTD. The examination should include, inspection, palpation, range of motion (active, passive and resisted) and other pertinent maneuvers of the upper extremities and back. Examples of the pertinent maneuvers for the hands and wrists include Tinel's test Phalen's test, and Finkelstein's test. Laboratory tests, x-rays and other diagnostic procedures are not a routine part of the baseline assessment. 7) Analyze light duty jobs for CTD potential. a) This written analysis shall include the procedures used in the performance of each job, including lifting requirements, postures, hand grips and frequency of repetitive motion. Such analysis shall be reduced to written form and provided to nurses, doctors and supervisory personnel involved in the assignment of light duty jobs. b) When an employee in a job not previously evaluated reports a CTD to medical personnel, that employee's actual performance of the job shall be evaluated to determine if ergonomic risk factors exist and corrective action is necessary for the work station and work method. 8) Develop a policy to inform employees that they will not be discriminated against because they reasonably request and visit the medical facilities or because they have diagnosed CTD problems and are undergoing medical rehabilitation. 9) Institute an exercise program emphasizing flexibility and stretching to help limit CTD's (two to five minute program to be "built in" to the workday on a periodic basis). 10) Institute hourly breaks from repetitive motion at a frequency of three to five minutes per hour. 11) Institute periodic safety and health meetings to encourage employees to discuss their medical concerns in a group setting. STEP 1- First Quarter A) Submit to the Area Director a written compliance program and plan of action outlining a schedule for the implementation of this medical program to identify and control CTDs. Quarterly progress reports updating this program and plan will be submitted to the Area Director until final abatement. B) Design the baseline symptoms survey and complete catalog of job activities. C) Assure employee protection against discrimination. STEP 2- Second Quarter A) Conduct a symptoms survey to identify CTD. B) Initiate quarterly records review to monitor CTD trends. C) Implement a medical management protocol. D) Implement medical supervisory and employee training. E) Initiate analysis of all light duty jobs. STEP 3- Third Quarter A) Initiate baseline health surveillance. B) Complete analysis of light duty jobs. STEP 4- Fourth Quarter A) Corrective action shall be completed by the implementation of all phases of this medical program.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1000.00
- — Z (W) $10000.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Dec 21, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $6,000 · Current $6,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (W) $6000.00
- — Z (W) $6000.00
1904.4
- Issued
- Dec 21, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 19, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — F (W)
- — Z (W)
1904.2 B02
- Issued
- Dec 21, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 19, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — F (W)
- — Z (W)
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 100895481.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.