KANSAS CITY, MO —
OSHA Inspection: PENN VALLEY MEDICAL GROUP
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of PENN VALLEY MEDICAL GROUP in 2929 BALTIMORE, KANSAS CITY, MO 64108 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 100898931.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PENN VALLEY MEDICAL GROUP
- Site address
- 2929 BALTIMORE
- City
- KANSAS CITY
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 64108
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8011
- Employees
- 26
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 21, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 22, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $420 · Current $420
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that health care workers were exposed to the hazard of being potentially infected by HBV and/or HIV through direct contact with blood or other body fluids: a) In that employees including, but not limited to, nurses, medical assistants, x-ray technicians, physical therapists, and lab technicians who were engaged in procedures including, but not limited to, giving injections and collecting blood from patients, analyzing lab specimens and handling infectious wastes, had not received training in universal precautions by the employer. b) In that employees including, but not limited to, nurses, medical assistants, x-ray technicians, physical therapists, and lab technicians who were engaged in procedures including, but not limited to, giving injections and collecting blood from patients, analizing lab specimens and handling infectious wastes, were not offered Hepatitis B vaccinations. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer, given his superior knowledge of the workplace, feasibleand acceptable methods to correct this hazard, among others are: 1) Implement a training ad education program for all health care workers at risk. They shall receive education on precautionary measures, edidemiology, mode of transmission and prevention of HIV/ HBV. Health care workers shall be counseled regarding possible risks to the fetus from HIV/HBV and other associated infectious agents. In addition, such high risk workers must receive training regarding the location and proper use of personal protective equipment. They shall be trained concerning proper work practices and, if the facility has implemented them, shall understand the concept of "universal precautions" as it applies to their work practices. They shall be trained about the meaning of color coding or other methods (except tags) used to designate contaminated articles or infectious waste. Where tags are used, training about tabs and precautions to be used in handling contaminated articles or infectious waste is governed by 29 CFR 1910.145(f). Workers shall receive training about procedures to be used if they are exposed to needlestick or to body fluids. 2) The facility's IC policy regarding hepatitis B vaccinations shall address all circumstances warranting such vaccinations and shall identify employees at substantial risk of directly contacting body fluids. All such employees shall be offered Hepatitis B vaccinations free of charge in amounts and at times prescribed by standard medical practices.
1910.141 A04 II
- Issued
- Sep 21, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 22, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Sep 21, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 22, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Sep 21, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 22, 1990
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 22, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $420 · Current $420
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Sep 21, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 22, 1990
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 22, 1990
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Sep 21, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 22, 1990
1903.2 A01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 22, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $70 · Current $70
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Sep 21, 1990
- Abate by
- Oct 22, 1990
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 100898931.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.