SIKESTON, MO ·
OSHA Inspection: HEDRICK CONCRETE PRODUCTS CORP.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HEDRICK CONCRETE PRODUCTS CORP. in 830 ROTH ST., SIKESTON, MO 63801 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 100913466.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HEDRICK CONCRETE PRODUCTS CORP.
- Site address
- 830 ROTH ST.
- City
- SIKESTON
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63801
- Mailing
- PO BOX 1087, SIKESTON, MO 63801
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3271
- Employees
- 92
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 28, 1989
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $560 · Current $560
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing hazards due to inadvertent or intentional start up of machinery while performing maintenance or cleaning operations on plant equipment such as Silos for Block Plant, bins #1-8. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to establish and enforce an adequate plant lockout/tagout procedure consisting of, but not limited to, the following: 1) The development of an energy control program, using locks when equipment can be locked out. 2) Employment of additional means to ensure safety when tags rather than locks are used to control energy sources by implementing and enforcing an effective tagout program. 3) Ensure that new equipment or overhauled equipment can accommodate locks. 4) Identification and implementation of specific procedures (preferably in writing) for the control of hazardous energy including preparation for shutdown, actual shutdown or equipment, isolation of equipment, lock/tagout application, release of stored energy, and verification of isolation. 5) Institution of procedures for release of lockout/tagout including machine inspection, notification and safe positioning of employees and removal of the lockout/tagout device. 6) Obtaining standardized locks and tags which indicate the identity of the employee using them and which are of sufficient quality and durability to ensure their effectiveness. 7) Conducting inspections of energy control procedures on a frequent basis. 8) Training of employees in the specific energy control procedures with training reminders as part of the periodic inspections of the control procedures. 9) Adoption of procedures to ensure safety when equipment must be tested during servicing, when outside contractors are working at the site, when a multiple lockout is needed for a crew servicing equipment and when shifts or personnel change. This abatement method outlined above is general and the employer, based on his superior knowledge of working conditions, is responsible for developing and implementing an abatement method which will be suitably protective of employee's safety and health. NOTE: The new OSHA Lockout/Tagout standard goes into effect October 31, 1989 and should be followed when developing an abatement program. However, there has been an administrative stay on enforcement until January 2, 1990.
Recent events (4)
- · F (S) $560.00
- · F $4725.00
- · Z $6300.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 28, 1989
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $560 · Current $560
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to hazards associated with oxygen deficiency and toxic atmospheres during confined entry to perform maintenance and cleaning operations at the Aggregate Storage Silos for Block Plant, Bins #1-8: One feasible and acceptable method, among others, to correct this hazard is to institute a formal confined space entry program. A minimally acceptable confined space entry procedure consists of the following elements: 1) Written procedures covering a permit system, personal protective equipment, ventilation, atmospheric testing, rescue procedures, and employee training. 2) The completion and posting of a confined space entry permit which requires authorization and approval in writing that specifies the location and type of work to be done and certifies that all existing and potential hazards have been evaluated by a qualified person and necessary protective measures have been taken to ensure the safety of each worker. 3) Mechanical ventilation of the confined space prior to entry and continued ventilation to provide safe atmosphere, when determined necessary as described in (2) above. 4) Testing the atmosphere of the confined space prior to entry and on a regular basis for presence of sufficient oxygen a minimum of 19.5% and absence of hazardous levels of toxic or combustible gases or vapors, when determined necessary as described in (2) above. 5) Emergency rescue procedures with a requirement that trained personnel are available and are stationed outside the confined space with proper equipment to provide for the rescue of persons entering the space as determined necessary as described in (2) above. Such equipment must include safety harness and lifelines with provisions for hoisting employees from the confined space. If entry is required, the rescuing employees must be equipped with approved air supplied respiratory equipment and other appropriate personal protective equipment. 6) Training of any and all employees required to enter the confined spaces. This training shall include procedures required for entry, the hazards associated with work in confined spaces, and rescue training procedures. NOTE: The abatement method outlined above is general and the employer, based on his superior knowledge of working conditions, is responsible for developing and implementing an abatement method which will be suitably protective of employee's safety and health.
Recent events (4)
- · F (S) $560.00
- · F $100.00
- · Z $6300.00
More inspections at Hedrick Concrete Products Corp.
View Hedrick Concrete Products Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 100913466.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.