HOWARD, SD —
OSHA Inspection: HOWARD BEEF PROCESSORS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HOWARD BEEF PROCESSORS, INC. in EAST HIGHWAY 34, HOWARD, SD 57349 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 100929843.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HOWARD BEEF PROCESSORS, INC.
- Site address
- EAST HIGHWAY 34
- City
- HOWARD
- State
- SD
- ZIP
- 57349
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 707, HOWARD, SD 57349
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2013
- Employees
- 61
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
34 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 19, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $640 · Current $256 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: a) On or about June 29, 1989, and at times prior thereto, at Howard Beef Processors, Inc., East Highway 34, Howard, South Dakota, employees were exposed to potential serious accidents in the workplace due to operations being performed by employees who were under the influence of a controlled substance. Among other method, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is the implementation of a Substance Abuse Program which could include the following essentials: 1) Development and implementation of a formal written Substance Abuse Program. 2) Appointment of a Program Coordinator or an in-plant advisory committee. 3) Coordinate with a local clinic, hospital, or private doctor for screening processes which may include: a) Pre-employment physical with substance testing. b) Cause testing (employees involved in workplace accidents). c) Random, unannounced testing. d) Annual, unannounced testing. 4) Provide training to educate the managers and supervisors for signs and symptoms of substance abuse. 5) Provide employee training on the Substance Abuse Program outlining the employee/employer rights and responsibilities. 6) Provide information to employees for chemical dependency treatment (drugs and alcohol). 7) Implement a written enforcement procedure for repeated cases.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $256.00
- — Z (S) $640.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: a) The employer did not implement a main power lock-out program where employees throughout the plant were required to clean, maintain,and operate machines and equipment. Employees were exposed to the hazard of having parts of their bodies crushed, lacerated, or amputated in the event that machines should be re-started during normal operations. Feasible and useful methods of abatement, among other methods, would be to provide the protection of a positive main power lock-out procedure, which would include the following essentials: 1) Open and lock-out main power disconnect for the machine and bleed off any residual energy prior to performing cleaning and maintenance operations. 2) Provide each potentially exposed employee working in the area with separate lock and key to be placed on the lock-out means. 3) Establish a written lock-out policy including procedures to be followed and training for all affected employees. 4) Install automatic braking devices which will stop all movement of machinery immediately upon interruption of power to the machine. 5) Install interlock devices which will prevent any access doors from being opened before the machine has come to complete stop. 6) Periodically evaluate the program and strickly enforce all of its provisions.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $400.00
- — Z (S) $1000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $420 · Current $168 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employee did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: a) On or about June 29, 1989 and times prior thereto, at Howard Beef Processors, Inc., East Highway 34, Howard, South Dakota, employees were exposed to the hazard of having parts of their bodies struck, crushed, electrically shocked, or amputated by being exposed to serious physical hazards located throughout the plant. The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to their work enviroment to control or eliminate any hazards or exposure to injury. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to provide specialized training for all personnel who may be required to operate, maintain, or service processing equipment and all personnel who may be required to perform dangerous tasks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $168.00
- — Z (S) $420.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $810 · Current $324 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $324.00
- — Z (S) $810.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
1910.242 A
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 1989
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $490 · Current $196 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $196.00
- — Z (S) $490.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $640 · Current $256 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $256.00
- — Z (S) $640.00
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 1989
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $640 · Current $256 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $256.00
- — Z (S) $640.00
1910.219 F01
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 1989
1910.219 F03
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 1989
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $400.00
- — Z (S) $1000.00
1910.305 A02 IIIE
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
1910.305 A02 IIIG
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
1910.305 B02
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
1910.305 G01 III
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
1910.305 J04 IIA
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $210 · Current $84 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $84.00
- — Z (R) $210.00
1910.212 A05
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $840 · Current $336 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $336.00
- — Z (R) $840.00
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 1989
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 1989
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $1,620 · Current $648 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $648.00
- — Z (R) $1620.00
1910.304 A02
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 1989
1903.2 A01
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
1910.30 B03
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 1989
1910.36 B04
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 1989
1910.37 Q01
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 1989
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 1989
1910.101 B
- Issued
- Oct 5, 1989
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 1989
More inspections at Howard Beef Processors, INC.
View Howard Beef Processors, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in SD
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 100929843.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.