NORTH BRUNSWICK, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: NEW BRUNSWICK PEDIATRIC GROUP
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of NEW BRUNSWICK PEDIATRIC GROUP in 1300 HOW LANE, NORTH BRUNSWICK, NJ 08902 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 101151413.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NEW BRUNSWICK PEDIATRIC GROUP
- Site address
- 1300 HOW LANE
- City
- NORTH BRUNSWICK
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 08902
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 8011
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $420 · Current $210 Reduced
General-duty citation text
SECTION 5(A)(1) OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970: ON OR ABOUT 5/23/90, THE EMPLOYER DID NOT FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND A PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT WHICH WERE FREE FROM RECOGNIZED HAZARDS THAT WERE CAUSING OR LIKELY TO CAUSE DEATH OR SERIOUS PHYSICAL HARM TO EMPLOYEE(S) IN THAT EMPLOYEE(S) WERE EXPOSED TO THE HAZARDS OF WORKING WITH BLOOD AND BODY FLUIDS THUS CAUSING OR LIKELY TO CAUSE EMPLOYEE EXPOSURE TO AND CONTRACTION OF HEPATITIS B (HBV) AND/OR HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS (HIV): A) HEALTH CARE WORKERS SUCH AS NURSING STAFF AND PHYSICIANS, ARE POTENTIALLY EXPOSED TO BLOOD BORNE PATHOGENS. FEASIBLE ABATEMENT METHODS FOR REDUCING THIS HAZARD INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: TRAINING AND EDUCATION: TRAINING AND EDUCATION OF EMPLOYEES SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, NURSING STAFF AND PHYSICIANS. SUCH TRAINING AND EDUCATION SHALL BE AT THE TIME OF INITIAL EMPLOYMENT AND AT LEAST ANNUALLY THEREAFTER. THE TRAINING MATERIALS USED SHALL BE APPROPRIATE IN CONTENT AND VOCABULARY TO EDUCATIONAL LEVEL, LITERACY, AND LANGUAGE BACKGROUND OF THE EMPLOYEES BEING TRAINED. THE TRAINING AND EDUCATION PROGRAM SHALL CONTAIN AT THE MINIMUM THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS: I) A GENERAL EXPLANATION OF THE MODES OF TRANSMISSION OF BLOOD BORNE PATHOGENS; II) AN EXPLANATION OF THE EMPLOYER'S INFECTION CONTROL PROGRAM; III) AN EXPLANATION OF THE APPROPRIATE METHODS FOR RECOGNIZING TASKS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES THAT MAY INVOLVE EXPOSURE TO BLOOD OR BODY FLUIDS AND OTHER POTENTIALLY INFECTIOUS MATERIALS; IV) AN EXPLANATION OF THE USE AND LIMITATIONS OF WORK PRACTICES THAT WILL PREVENT OR REDUCE EMPLOYEE EXPOSURE, INCLUDING APPROPRIATE ENGINEERING CONTROLS, WORK PRACTICES AND PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; V) AN EXPLANATION OF THE BASIS FOR SELECTION OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; VI) INFORMATION ON THE HEPATITIS B VACCINATION, INCLUDING INFORMATION ON ITS EFFICIENCY, SAFETY AND THE BENEFITS OF BEING VACCINATED; VII) INFORMATION ON THE APPROPRIATE ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN AND THE PERSON TO CONTACT IN AN EMERGENCY; VIII) AN EXPLANATION OF THE PROCEDURE TO FOLLOW IF AN EXPOSURE INCIDENT OCCURS, INCLUDING THE METHOD OF REPORTING THE INCIDENT AND THE MEDICAL FOLLOW-UP THAT WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE; IX) AN EXPLANATION OF THE SIGNS AND LABELS AND/OR COLOR CODING USED IN THE WORK PLACE; AND X) A COPY OF THE CENTER OF DISEASE CONTROL (CDC) GUIDELINES. WRITTEN INFECTION CONTROL PROGRAM: THE EMPLOYER SHALL DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT A WRITTEN INFECTION CONTROL PROGRAM TO MINIMIZE OR ELIMINATE EMPLOYEE EXPOSURE. THIS INFECTION CONTROL PROGRAM SHALL BE REVIEWED AND UPDATED AS NECESSARY TO REFLECT SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN TASKS OR PROCEDURES. THIS PROGRAM SHALL CONTAIN AT A MINIMUM THE FOLLOWING: I) A DETERMINATION OF THE EXPOSURE POTENTIAL OF ALL EMPLOYEES; II) THE SCHEDULE AND METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INFECTION CONTROL PROGRAM; III) INCORPORATE ALL THE ITEMS CONTAINED IN THE EMPLOYER'S INFECTION CONTROL TRAINING AND INFORMATION PROGRAM AS IT RELATES TO IDENTIFICATION EVALUATION AND CONTROL OF BLOOD PATHOGENS AND EXPOSURE TO BLOOD AND BODY FLUIDS. THE WRITTEN INFECTION CONTROL PROGRAM SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO ALL EMPLOYEES DURING THE TRAINING PROGRAM. HEPATITIS B VACCINATION: THE FACILITY'S INFECTION CONTROL POLICY REGARDING HEPATITIS B VACCINATIONS SHALL ADDRESS ALL CIRCUMSTANCES WARRANTING SUCH VACCINATIONS AND SHALL IDENTIFY EMPLOYEES OF SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF DIRECTLY CONTACTING BLOOD OR BODY FLUIDS. ALL SUCH EMPLOYEES SHALL BE OFFERED HEPATITIS B VACCINATIONS IN AMOUNTS AND AT TIMES PRESCRIBED BY STANDARD MEDICAL PRACTICE. FOLLOW-UP PROCEDURES AFTER POSSIBLE EXPOSURE TO HIV/HBV: IF AN EMPLOYEE HAS A PERCUTANEOUS (NEEDLE-STICK OR CUT) OR MUCOUS MEMBRANE (SPLASH TO EYE, NASAL MUCOSA, OR MOUTH), EXPOSURE TO BLOOD OR BODY FLUIDS OR HAS CUTANEOUS EXPOSURE TO BLOOD OR BODY FLUIDS WHEN THE WORKER'S SKIN IS CHAPPED, ABRADED OR OTHERWISE NON-INTACT, THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES SHALL BE FOLLOWED: A) THE EXPOSED EMPLOYEE(S) SHALL BE EVALUATED CLINICALLY BY HIV ANTIBODY TESTING AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AND ADVISED TO REPORT AND SEEK MEDICAL EVALUATION OF ANY ACUTE FEBRILE ILLNESS THAT OCCURS WITHIN 12 WEEKS AFTER EXPOSURE. HIV SERONEGATIVE WORKERS SHALL BE RETESTED 6 WEEKS POST-EXPOSURE AND ON A PERIODIC BASIS THEREAFTER (12 WEEKS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER EXPOSURE). B) FOLLOW-UP PROCEDURES SHALL BE TAKEN FOR EMPLOYEE(S) EXPOSED OR POTENTIALLY EXPOSED TO HBV. THE TYPE OF PROCEDURES DEPENDS ON THE IMMUNIZATION STATUS OF THE WORKER, (I.E., WHETHER HBV VACCINATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND ANTIBODY RESPONSE IS ADEQUATE). THE CDC IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE HAS PUBLISHED ITS RECCOMMENDATIONS REGARDING HBV POST-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS IN TABLE FORMAT IN THE JUNE 5, 1985, MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT. C) IF AN EMPLOYEE(S) REFUSES TO SUBMIT TO THE PROCEDURES, (A) OR (B) ABOVE, WHEN SUCH PROCEDURES ARE MEDICALLY INDICATED, NO ADVERSE ACTION CAN BE TAKEN ON THAT GROUND ALONE SINCE THE PROCEDURES ARE DESIGNED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE EXPOSED EMPLOYEE.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $210.00
- · Z (S) $420.00
1903.2 A01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 1990
1910.20 G01 I
- Issued
- Nov 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 1990
1910.20 G01 II
- Issued
- Nov 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 1990
1910.20 G01 III
- Issued
- Nov 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 1990
1910.20 G02
- Issued
- Nov 14, 1990
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 1990
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 101151413.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.