WOODBRIDGE, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: WOODBRIDGE DODGE, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of WOODBRIDGE DODGE, INC. in 450 KING GEORGE RD., WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 101152650.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WOODBRIDGE DODGE, INC.
- Site address
- 450 KING GEORGE RD.
- City
- WOODBRIDGE
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07095
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 5511
- Employees
- 45
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 2, 1990
- Abate by
- May 2, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $640 · Current $340 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: On or about 3/2/90, the employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of serious crushing injuries from the dropping of "Rotary" hydraulic automative lifts while working under vehicles on the lifts, which do not have locking devices or were below the point where the locking device engages, without supporting the vehicle with a jack stand at each corner of the lift or equivalent means. Two of the seven lifts had no locking devices. Three more had locking devices which could be engaged, only when the lift is fully extended: Feasible and acceptable methods, among others, to correct the hazard is to: 1) Support vehicles by the use of four jack stands or equivalent means for each vehicle under which an employee is required to work. 2) Instruct and train employees in the proper use of the manufacturer's mechanical locking devices, where provided, and safe operating instructions of the lifts. 3) Conduct required maintenance procedures described by the manufacturer. 4) Conduct the recommended inspections of the lifts by the manufacturer to ensure that the mechanical locking (safety) devices and all other operating components are in safe operating condition. Remove defective lifts from service until rendered safe for operation. 5) Post and maintain permanently on display, the manufacturer's safe lifting instructions in the lift area. Locations of unsafe "Rotary" lift devices observed on 3/2/90. a) Looking from "Service Center Office" (Lift one is the nearest): 1) Lift one and two - No locking device until fully extended. b) Looking from "Wash Bay" (Lift one is nearest): 1) Lift one - No locking device until fully extended. 2) Lifts two and three - No locking device of any type.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $340.00
- — Z (S) $640.00
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 2, 1990
- Abate by
- May 2, 1990
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 101152650.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.