Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WOODBRIDGE DODGE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of WOODBRIDGE DODGE, INC. in 450 KING GEORGE RD., WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 101152650.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Woodbridge Dodge, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Woodbridge Dodge, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
450 KING GEORGE RD.
City
WOODBRIDGE
State
NJ
ZIP
07095
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
5511
Employees
45
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 08 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 1990
Abate by
May 2, 1990
Penalty
Initial $640 · Current $340 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: On
or about 3/2/90, the employer did not furnish employment and a place of
employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or
likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that
employees were exposed to the hazard of serious crushing injuries from
the dropping of "Rotary" hydraulic automative lifts while working under
vehicles on the lifts, which do not have locking devices or were below
the point where the locking device engages, without supporting the
vehicle with a jack stand at each corner of the lift or equivalent
means. Two of the seven lifts had no locking devices. Three more had
locking devices which could be engaged, only when the lift is fully
extended:
Feasible and acceptable methods, among others, to correct the hazard is
to:
1) Support vehicles by the use of four jack stands or equivalent means
for each vehicle under which an employee is required to work.
2) Instruct and train employees in the proper use of the manufacturer's
mechanical locking devices, where provided, and safe operating
instructions of the lifts.
3) Conduct required maintenance procedures described by the
manufacturer.
4) Conduct the recommended inspections of the lifts by the manufacturer
to ensure that the mechanical locking (safety) devices and all other
operating components are in safe operating condition. Remove
defective lifts from service until rendered safe for operation.
5) Post and maintain permanently on display, the manufacturer's safe
lifting instructions in the lift area.
Locations of unsafe "Rotary" lift devices observed on 3/2/90.
a) Looking from "Service Center Office" (Lift one is the nearest):
1) Lift one and two - No locking device until fully extended.
b) Looking from "Wash Bay" (Lift one is nearest):
1) Lift one - No locking device until fully extended.
2) Lifts two and three - No locking device of any type.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $340.00
  • — Z (S) $640.00

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 2, 1990
Abate by
May 2, 1990

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 101152650.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.