BELZONI, MS ·
OSHA Inspection: DELTA BELZONI
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DELTA BELZONI in HIGHWAY 49 SOUTH, BELZONI, MS 39038 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 101395408.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DELTA BELZONI
- Site address
- HIGHWAY 49 SOUTH
- City
- BELZONI
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39038
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 89, BELZONI, MS 39038
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (Y)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2092
- Employees
- 1170
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1000 A02
- Issued
- Dec 19, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $800 · Current $200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $200.00
- · Z (S) $800.00
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Dec 19, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 1990
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Dec 19, 1989
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $700 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $700.00
- · Z (W) $2000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 19, 1989
- Abate by
- Mar 22, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $3,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that improper medical management of employee injuries and illnesses exposed employees to the increased risk of serious and debilitating injuries and illnesses: (c) Employees were delayed access to appropriate medical care for detection, evaluation, and treatment of injuries and illnesses.
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $3700.00
- · Z (W) $10000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 19, 1989
- Abate by
- Jun 22, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $3,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees who were exposed to the risk of Cumulative Trauma Disorders (CTD) were further exposed to the risk of increased severity and/or reoccurance of the illnesses in that an effective ergonomics program was not emplemented: a) Throughout the plant. Feasible abatement methods to correct the hazard may include, but not be limited to the following: 1) Identification of all current employees experiencing symptoms generally associated with a cumulative trauma disorders or back injuries. 2) A survey of all work areas to identify actions and stressors which may contribute to cumulative trauma disorders or back injuries. 3) Develop a training and awareness program for employees. 4) Develop a pre-placement job program, such as review of employees work histories relative to cumulative trauma disorders and pre-employment examinations with special attention to upper extremities including strength and stamina testing. 5) Develop a work conditioning program to help new employees adapt to the various tasks. 6) Develop a light duty program. 7) Develop a medical surveillance program for tracking cumulative trauma disorders and back injuries. Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposure to the hazardous conditions as referenced in this citation. This plan shall be submitted within the first ninety (90) days of the abatement period. Thereafter, ninety (90) day progress reports shall be submitted the the Area Director.
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $3700.00
- · Z (W) $10000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 19, 1989
- Abate by
- Jun 22, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $10,000 · Current $3,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that emplyees were required to perform lifting & repetitive tasks which require various hand, wrist & arm postures, resulting in stressors likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders and back injuries and administrative and engineering controls were not implemented: a) Long Gun Operation. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include, but are not limited to: 1) Keep the area cleaner and less slimy so that the fish will be easier to grip. 2) Put a cutting edge on the long gun so that the points where the evisera are connected to the fish can be easily severed. 3) Have the fish in a stationary trolley and make the vacuum a hand tool. 4) Use gloves that will give workers the needed grip on the fish. 5) Lower the vacuum nozzle. 6) Use greater suction force in the vacuums. 7) Use a rotary brush to remove eviscera. b) Fillet Department. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include, but are not limited to: 1) Break the task down into a series of tasks to be performed by different workers to eliminate the excessive movement required to go from one cut to the next. 2) Provide a moveable fixture to hold the fish and introduce them to workers at the correct height and angle. 3) Provide different types of knives for making different cuts recognizing that no one knife will be appropriate for all of the different types of cuts made in the fillet task. 4) Experiment with alternate methods of filleting. One slow cut may be able to do the work of four quick cuts. 5) Develop a system so that workers always use a sharp knife. 6) Redesign the workplace so that workers can reach their supply of fish to be filleted without excessive reaches and twisting. 7) Provide for workstation height adjustability. 8) Provide workplace seating. C) Rippers. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazards rests with the employer given his knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Use a powered tool to make the rip cut. 2) Have the fish positioned in a trolley. 3) Use gloves that will provide the needed grip on the fish. 4) Use a knife that is compatible with the cut being made. 5) Rinse fish before gripping. d) Feeders Band Saw. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazards rests with the employer given his knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Allow for work height adjustability. 2) Use a narrow fish supply trough. 3) Use gloves to make the gripping easier. 4) Redesign the entire task to allow the feeder to put fish in "hot dog style" carriers. 5) Use conveyors to bring the fish to the worker and carry properly oriented fish to the head saw. e) Skinners. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazards rest with the employer given his knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Have the fish in a fixture that takes them by skin puller blade, and manually position only to touch up as needed. 2) Use gloves to make the gripping easier. 3) Allow for adjustability of work height. 4) Rinse fish before gripping. 5) Put the supply of fish to be skinned closer to the workers. f) Headsaw Operators - Band Saw. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazards rests with the employer given his knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Allow for work height adjustibilty. 2) Reduce the reach distance to the saw. 3) Put the fish in a fixture to eliminate tight gripping of fish. 4) Make the saw rotate rather than the workers' wrists. g) Tub Diggers/Utility Operators. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazards tests with the employer given his knowledge of the operation, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard may include but are not limited to: 1) Reduce weight handled. 2) Use self-leveling hoppers to mitigate working in and lifting from stooped postures. 3) Use narrower hoppers to reduce the horizontal distance workers must reach to lift pans. 4) Use smaller pans for tansporting fish. Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measure to control employees exposure to the hazardous conditions as referenced in this citation. This plan shall be submitted within the first sixty (60) days of the abatement period. Thereafter, thirty (30) day progress reports shall be submitted to Area Director. (4) Development of detailed procedures for cleaning up blood spills which will include properly sanitizing the area. Observed on or about 6/26/90.
Recent events (2)
- · F (W) $3700.00
- · Z (W) $10000.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Dec 19, 1989
- Abate by
- Jun 22, 1990
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Dec 19, 1989
- Abate by
- Mar 22, 1990
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.1200 E01 II
- Issued
- Dec 19, 1989
- Abate by
- Mar 22, 1990
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.1200 E01 III
- Issued
- Dec 19, 1989
- Abate by
- Mar 22, 1990
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
More inspections at Delta Belzoni
View Delta Belzoni's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 101395408.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.