WELLSTON, MO —
OSHA Inspection: LEE-ROWAN COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LEE-ROWAN COMPANY in 6333 ETZEL, WELLSTON, MO 63133 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 101512408.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEE-ROWAN COMPANY
- Site address
- 6333 ETZEL
- City
- WELLSTON
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63133
- Mailing
- 6333 ETZEL, ST. LOUIS, MO 63133
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3496
- Employees
- 250
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 13, 1990
- Abate by
- May 23, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $480 · Current $480
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death of serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of additional trauma and aggravation of previous injuries in cases such as tendonitis, and chronic extensor tenosynovitis because of being assigned work activities contrary to physicians' restrictions. Examples in which employees were under physicians work restrictions and were placed in work positions not compatible with restrictions likely to cause further serious physical harm are listed below: a) An employee diagnosed with traumatic tendonitis of the right wrist was given work restrictions beginning on 8/28/89 not to use the right hand for one week. The employee was returned to work with sweeping and cleaning duties, for approximately two weeks, that required the use of both hands, and which was not compatible with the physician's restriction. b) An employee diagnosed with chronic extensor tenosynovitis to the right wrist was given a work restriction on 7/11/89 not to use the right hand; the restriction continued for one week. The employee, upon return to work, was required to operate a lift truck that required the use of both hands, which was not compatible with the physician's restrictions. Lift truck operation was for two days during the initial work restricted period. While ultimate responsibility for correcting the hazard rests with the employer given his superior knowledge of the operation, feasible, and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard include, but are not limited to: 1) Implement a comprehensive written program inclusing priorities for treatment, job reassignment and follow-up of injuries/illnesses. The program shall include provisions for prompt recognition and evaluation of employees symptoms, scheduling procedures for employees to help them recover from injuries/illnesses and possible surgery and assurance of management's implementation fo medical restrictions. This program shall be part of the overall written plan describing how and when each element will be accomplished. The overall plan shall be reviewed and updated quarterly to ensure goals are being met or to identify changes needed. 2) Implement a written program to identify employees development injuries/illnesses and work methods and work stations causing injuries/illnesses. a) Design a baseline symptoms survey to measure, on a plant-wide basis, the extent of employee awareness of their symptoms of work-related disorders. b) Conduct a plant-wide symptoms survey and repeat it annually to detect any significant change in the incidence, scope, and/or location of reported symptoms. This survey will also help to determine the effectiveness of the overall medical management program and employees job rotation program as related to injuries/illnesses. c) Compile, and keep current, a written catalog of job activities for each work position. The activity preformed at the work position should be described and stressors identified as they affect specific parts of the body such as: physical stress, forces required to exert, posture (twisting, turning, lifting, bending, misalignment of body parts), workstation hardware, repetitiveness of activity, lack of breaks, tool design, training, employee turn over. A current catalog is very necessary to establish any "light duty" work position and have an effective job rotation program. 3) Implement a written medical management protocol for injuries/ illnesses as follows: a) A protocol will be directed by a physician and followed by management which will allow sufficient time for the involved muscle/tendon/nerve group to heal. This shall include time off work, or transfer to another job which allows the affected muscle/tendon/nerve group to rest. Employees shall be evaluated by a physician to assess their capability to return to work. Upon returning to work, they shall, when directed by a physician, be permitted to recondition the injured muscle/tendon/nerve group by gradual resumption of duties. This should occur in addition to any other prescribed treatements. b) Consultant physicians, will be informed as necessary as to the availability of light duty jobs appropriate for an employee with a specific condition. 4) Develop and implement a training program for all supervisors and employees to enable them to recognize early symptoms, the need for proper medical care, and the need to ensure work activities are compatible with emloyees physical conditions. 5) Analyze light duty jobs for injury/illness potential. a) This written analysis shall include the procedures used in the performance of each job, including lifting requirements, postures, hand grips and frequency of repetitive motion. Such analysis shall be reduce to written form and provided to doctors, and supervisory personnel involved in the assignment of light duty jobs. b) When an employees in a job not previously evaluated reports an injury/illness to medical personnel, that employee's actual performance of the job shall be evaluated to determine if risk factors exist and corrective action is necessary for the work station and work method. 6) Develop a policy to inform employees that they will not be discriminated against because they reasonably request and visit the medical facilities or because they have diagnosed injury/illnesses and are undergoing medical rehabilitation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $480.00
- — Z (S) $480.00
1904.2 A
- Issued
- Mar 13, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.134 B01
- Issued
- Mar 13, 1990
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 1990
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Lee-Rowan Company
View Lee-Rowan Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 101512408.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.