Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: DANTAM STRUCTURES INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DANTAM STRUCTURES INC. in 5900 N. ANDREWS AVE., FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 101716926.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Dantam Structures INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dantam Structures INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5900 N. ANDREWS AVE.
City
FORT LAUDERDALE
State
FL
ZIP
33309
Mailing
533 N. LAKE BLVD., SUITE 5, NORTH PALM BEACH, FL 33408
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
1771
Employees
50
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Construction safety.

3 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 1987
Abate by
Mar 26, 1987
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $250 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to:
a) On or about February 13, 1987, the Schwing KVM 28 Separate Placing
Boom (serial No. 10065) was used to lift rebar into place on the 18th
floor of the site. This practice is contrary to the manufacturer's
specifications, and exposed employees to the hazard of being struck
by falling objects.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this
hazard, would be to prohibit use of the boom as a hoist as specified by
the manufacturer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $250.00
  • · Z (S) $450.00

1926.250 B01

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 1987
Abate by
Mar 29, 1987
Penalty
Initial $360 · Current $180 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $180.00
  • · Z (S) $360.00

1926.500 B01

Serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 1987
Abate by
Mar 27, 1987
Penalty
Initial $270 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $135.00
  • · Z (S) $270.00

View Dantam Structures INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 101716926.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.