DOUGLAS, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: HOFFMAN SEEDS, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of HOFFMAN SEEDS, INC. in RT. 8, DOUGLAS, IL 61572 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 101760742.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HOFFMAN SEEDS, INC.
- Site address
- RT. 8
- City
- DOUGLAS
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61572
- Mailing
- RR#1, YATES CITY, IL 61572
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 0723
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 2, 1986
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 1986
- Penalty
- Initial $420 · Current $255 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Employees performing cleaning operations in the elevator pit and leveling operations in the dryers were exposed to hazards of second, third degree burns/death due to the potential presence of explosive mixtures of vapors, gases, dusts, and oxygen and fractures and asphyxiation due to potentially unstable work surfaces and oxygen atmospheres; in that proper confined space entry procedures were not developed and implemented at the facility. A feasible method of abatement includes, but is not limited to: 1) Written procedures covering a permit system, ventilation, atmospheric testing, rescue procedures, and employee training. 2) The completion and posting of a confined space entry permit which requires authorization and approval in writing that specifies the location and type of work to be done and certifies that all existing and potential hazards have been evaluated by a qualified person and necessary protective measures have been taken to ensure the safety of each worker. 3) Mechanical ventilation of the confined space prior to entry and continued ventilation to provide a safe atmosphere, when determined necessary as described in (2) above. 4) Testing the atmosphere of the confined space prior to entry and on a regular basis for presence of sufficient oxygen (19.5%) and absence of hazardous levels of toxic or combustible gases or vapors, when determined necessary as described in (a) above. 4) At the start of the work to be performed, switch-off and use a worker individual lock on the electric control switch to prevent re- energizing the machine. After switch-off, assure that the electric circuits are proven de-energized, a unique and situation information tag shall be attached to the lock and machine energizing control. This lock shall not be required where the worker, by his immediate proximity to the electrical control switch (within reach), prevents inadvertant switch-on by others. 5) All other fluid energy power sources which can produce movements of machine members shall be locked off. Pressurized fluids (air or liquid) shall be closed off from the machine through the use of shutoff valves, and the supply lines toward the machine reduced in pressure to atmospheric or the machine blocked against possible movement. All pressure-fluid accumulator an air surge tanks within the machine shall be reduced to atmospheric pressure or the machine blocked against possible movement. 6) All mechanical gravity fall potential energy within the machine shall be reduced to zero, or as nearly so as possible, by lowering elevated machine parts to the floor, solid surfaces or by cribbing and blocking them to prevent the machine parts from falling. 7) All mechanical kinetic rotating machine energy within the machine shall be reduced to zero, or as nearly so as possible, by slowing the rotating parts to a stop. In the alternative, the worker shall be guarded from the rotating parts by installing temporary guards. Loose machine parts including machine parts, arms, knives, etc. shall be blocked or secured to prevent possible injury to workers. 8) Necessary work on the machine shall be performed. Upon completion, all guards, tie offs, valves, cribbing and blockages shall be removed from the machine in a a manner to prevent worker injuries. The machine shall be re-energized and run experimentally. The fully functional machine shall be formally returned to service, and the operations manager shall countersign the safety machine out- tag and work order. 9) The employer shall formally document his safe machine maintenance program. He shall develop a training program to instruct affected maintenance and operations workers and management. 10) The employer shall train his workers in the safer machine maintenance program. The training shall be repeated as frequently as is necessary to maintain management and worker proficiency and compliance with the procedures.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $255.00
- · Z (S) $420.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 2, 1986
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 1986
- Penalty
- Initial $350 · Current $210 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Employees performing maintenance and repair work on such equipment as conveyors, sizers, grading machines, fans for dryers, and electrical equipment were exposed to the hazards of amputations, fractures, severe lacerations, and electrical energization of equipment as equipment was not positively locked out. Abatement of the hazard can be accomplished by the establishment of management controls over the work being performed, instructions of workers in the recognition of hazards, safe shut down of machines, blocking, stopping and reducing machines to Zero Mechanical Energy (ZMS), and documentation of maintenance performed. Specific elements of the abatement program shall be expected to include, but not necessarily be limited to: 1) Secure and maintain current operations and maintenance manuals on all machines to be serviced. Assure provision of appropriate manuals and/ or information contained to affected workers before work is begun. 2) Analyze all machines and determine the electrical, mechanical and nip point hazards which are present. Establish and document the procedure which will be used in performing maintenance of machines. 3) Establish and use a documented work order system for machine maintenance and repairs. Document repairs made, both preventive and breakage, and use the information to improve preventive maintenance, reduce costs, increase on-line time, and reduce worker injuries.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $210.00
- · Z (S) $350.00
1910.307 B
- Issued
- Jun 4, 1986
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 1986
- Penalty
- Initial $490 · Current $255 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $255.00
- · Z (S) $490.00
1910.25 D02 I
- Issued
- Jun 4, 1986
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 1986
1910.26 C03 III
- Issued
- Jun 4, 1986
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 1986
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 101760742.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.