Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: HEINZ, U.S.A., DIVISION OF H. J. HEINZ CO.

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of HEINZ, U.S.A., DIVISION OF H. J. HEINZ CO. in 1200 N. FIFTH ST., FREMONT, OH 43420 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 102375615.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Heinz, U.S.A., Division of H. J. Heinz CO. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Heinz, U.S.A., Division of H. J. Heinz CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1200 N. FIFTH ST.
City
FREMONT
State
OH
ZIP
43420
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
2033
Employees
900
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

3 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 1987
Abate by
Nov 12, 1987
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to
inadvertent activation of a tomato elevator while performing maintenance
or repairs:
On or about August 22, 1987, employees were maintaining or repairing
the #4 tomato elevator while electrical energy to the motor was not
effectively locked out, exposing employees to death or crushing
injuries.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to fully emplement and enforce the lockout
procedures contained in the employer's Loss Prevention Program dated
August 1, 1975, and to ensure that all employees are trained and
familiar with said procedures and supplied with necessary locks and
tags before being permitted to perform maintenance, repair, or
adjustment of machines and equipment capable of causing injury by
unintended movement or energization.

1910.303 F

Serious 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 1987
Abate by
Nov 12, 1987
Penalty
Initial $540 · Current $540

1910.305 J04 IIE

Serious 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 1987
Abate by
Nov 27, 1987
Penalty
Initial $540 · Current $540

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 102375615.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.