STREATOR, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: PEABODY - MYERS CORP
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PEABODY - MYERS CORP in 1621 S. ILLINOIS STREET, STREATOR, IL 61364 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 102504792.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PEABODY - MYERS CORP
- Site address
- 1621 S. ILLINOIS STREET
- City
- STREATOR
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61364
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3589
- Employees
- 212
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 D02 I
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 6, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $360 · Current $180 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $180.00
- · Z (S) $360.00
1910.106 E02 IVA
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 6, 1990
1910.107 B05 I
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $360
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (S) $360.00
1910.107 B09
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 1990
1910.107 G05
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 1, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $360
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (S) $360.00
1910.108 C05
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $270 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $135.00
- · Z (S) $270.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $450.00
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 6, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $225.00
- · Z (S) $450.00
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 6, 1990
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 9, 1990
- Penalty
- Initial $630
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (S) $630.00
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 1990
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 1990
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 1990
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Feb 20, 1990
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 1990
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 7, 1990
- Abate by
- Jan 1, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $720 · Current $360 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: In the cleaning department, employees were exposed to the hazard of falls of approximately 7 to 11 feet from the top of street cleaning trucks to the concrete floor below. Employees climb the trucks for the purpose of cleaning and buffing, and there were no means to protect the employees from falls. Feasible and effective abatement can be expected to include, but is not limited to: 1) Install a suspended static line or life line in an arrangement which can be used by employees during the cleaning and buffing operation when they are required to work on top of the street cleaning trucks 7 to 11 feet high, and employ a program requiring the use of safety belts and lanyards attached to the safety lines. 2) Construct a portable scaffold system which allows the system to be adjusted to meet the design of the various sizes of street cleaning trucks and provides perimeter guarding aroundthe truck when employees are required to work on top of the truck. DISCLAIMERS: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement methods suggested by OSHA. b) The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. c) The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $360.00
- · Z (S) $720.00
More inspections at Peabody - Myers Corp
View Peabody - Myers Corp's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 102504792.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.