Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: ASHLAND ALUMINUM INCORPORATED

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ASHLAND ALUMINUM INCORPORATED in 1925 NORTH MENDELL, CHICAGO, IL 60622 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 102535465.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ashland Aluminum Incorporated for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ashland Aluminum Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1925 NORTH MENDELL
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60622
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (Y)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3355
Employees
14
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1995
Abate by
Apr 18, 1995
Penalty
Initial $1,050 · Current $525 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were
exposed to:
(a)  On or about January 27, 1995 employees were exposed
to the hazard of being struck by hoist suspended loads due
to use of an overhead hoist with a kinked and frayed load
line.
Among other methods, one feasible and useful method to
correct this hazard is to replace this cable and to implement
a program of running rope inspections as prescribed in
ANSI B30.16, 1973 American National Standard Institute,
standard for overhead hoists as follows:
16-2.2.4.1  Inspection
(a)All running ropes in periodic use throughout the
shift shall be visually inspected once each shift by
the operator or an appointed person. A thorough
inspection of all ropes shall be made at least once
each month and a full written, dated and signed
report of rope condition kept on file where readily
available to appointed personnel.  All inspections
shall be performed by an appointed or designated
person.  Any deterioration resulting in appreciable
loss of original strength, such as described below,
shall be carefully noted and determination made as
to whether further use of the rope would constitute
a safety hazard.
(1)Reduction of rope diameter below nominal
due to loss of core support, internal or
external corrosion or wear of outside wires.
(2)A number of broken outside wires and the
degree or distribution or concentration od
such broken wires.
(3)Worn outside wires.
(4)Sections of rope which are normally hidden
during inspection or maintenance
procedures, such as parts passing oversheaves, should be given close
inspection
as
these are points most subject to
deterioration.
(5)Corroded or broken wires at end
connections.
(6)Corroded, cracked, bent, worn or
improperly applied end connections.
(7)Kinking, crushing, cutting or unstranding.
(b)All rope which has been idle for a period of a
month or more due to shutdown or storage of a
hoist on which it is installed, shall be given a
thorough inspection before it is placed in service.
This inspection shall be for all types of deterioration
and shall be performed by an appointed or
designated person whose approval shall be required
for further use of the rope.  A written and dated
report of the rope condition shall be filed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $525.00
  • · Z (S) $1050.00

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1995
Abate by
Apr 18, 1995
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $375 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $375.00
  • · Z (S) $750.00

1910.178 P01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1995
Abate by
Apr 18, 1995
Penalty
Initial $450
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O)
  • · Z (S) $450.00

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1995
Abate by
Mar 29, 1995
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $100.00
  • · Z (S) $600.00

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1995
Abate by
Mar 29, 1995
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1904.2 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 1995
Abate by
Mar 29, 1995
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O)
  • · Z (O)

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 102535465.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.