HIGHLAND, IL —
OSHA Inspection: HULCHER EMERGENCY SERVICE, INC., DIVISION 42
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HULCHER EMERGENCY SERVICE, INC., DIVISION 42 in OLD ROUTE 40 WEST, HIGHLAND, IL 62249 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 102584216.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HULCHER EMERGENCY SERVICE, INC., DIVISION 42
- Site address
- OLD ROUTE 40 WEST
- City
- HIGHLAND
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62249
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 306, HIGHLAND, IL 62249
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4789
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 26, 1989
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $269 · Current $269
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $269.00
- — Z (S) $269.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 26, 1989
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 1989
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 8, 1989
- Abate by
- May 11, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $420 · Current $230 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The %% employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: ...the hazards of being struck by falling loads and/or portions of the hoisting boom and load line due to failure of the hoist winch mounting on the Caterpillar model number 583 side boom tractor serial number 61A944, property number 15-4-021. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to properly repair the stripped-out mounting bolt in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and certification, as required by section 2.3.1.(b) of American National Standards Institute standard B 30.14-1979 Side Boom Tractors. DISCLAIMERS: 1) You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2) The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3) The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $230.00
- — Z (S) $420.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 8, 1989
- Abate by
- May 19, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $490 · Current $490
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: ...the hazards of being struck by falling loads and/or portions of the hoisting boom and load line due to failure of side boom hoist and/or load line components on the Caterpillar model number 572 side boom tractor serial number 40V740, property number 16-9-018. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to perform a rated load test in accordance with section 2.2.1(a) of American National Standards Institute standard B30. 14-1979 Side Boom Tractors, with the six part reeving provided in lieu of the manufacturer's specified four part hoist line. DISCLAIMERS: 1) You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2) The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3) The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $490.00
- — Z (S) $490.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 8, 1989
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $420 · Current $420
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: ...the hazards of being struck by falling loads and/or portions of the hoisting boom and load line due to the collapse of the box section hoist boom on the caterpillar model number 583 side boom tractor serial number 61A943, property number 15-4-020. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to replace the damaged main and spare booms for this unit with booms certified by the manufacturer as being the equivalent of original equipment, the required by section 2.3.3.(c)(3) of Amerian National Standards Institute standard B30.14-2979 Side Boom Tractors. DISCLAIMERS: 1) You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2) The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3) The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $420.00
- — Z (S) $420.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 8, 1989
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $490 · Current $490
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: ...the hazards of being struck by falling loads and/or portions of the hoisting boom and load line due to the collapse of the re- manufactured box-section hoist boom on the Caterpillar model number 583 side boom tractor serial number 61A943, property number 15-4-020. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to have all re-manufactured main and spare booms for this unit with certification by the manufacturer as being the equivalent of original equipment, as required by section 2.3.1(b) of American National Standards Institute standard B 30.14-1979 Side Boom tractors. DISCLAIMERS: 1) You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2) The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3) The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $490.00
- — Z (S) $490.00
1910.184 D
- Issued
- May 8, 1989
- Abate by
- May 15, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $490 · Current $269 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $269.00
- — Z (S) $490.00
1910.183 E01
- Issued
- May 8, 1989
- Abate by
- May 15, 1989
1910.184 E07 I
- Issued
- May 8, 1989
- Abate by
- May 15, 1989
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.252 A01 I
- Issued
- May 8, 1989
- Abate by
- May 11, 1989
- Penalty
- Initial $350 · Current $192 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $192.00
- — Z (S) $350.00
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- May 8, 1989
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 1989
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 102584216.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.