READING, PA —
OSHA Inspection: SWEET STREET DESSERTS, INCORPORATED
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SWEET STREET DESSERTS, INCORPORATED in 722 HEISTERS LANE, READING, PA 19605 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 102597168.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SWEET STREET DESSERTS, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 722 HEISTERS LANE
- City
- READING
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 19605
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 15127, READING, PA 19612
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2053
- Employees
- 270
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 1992
- Penalty
- Initial $360 · Current $360
8302
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Saftey and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were required to perform tasks involving repetitive motions resulting in stresses that had caused, were causing, or were likely to cause cumulative trauma disorders: A) Finishing Department, Line #1 - One to three (1-3) employees spread icing on a variety of cakes and pies over a workshift, on or about November 6, 1990. B) Finishing Department, Line #1 - Three to four (3-4) employees working along a conveyor decorate various types of cakes using a pasty bag, on or about November 6, 1990. C) Finishing Departiment, Line #2 - Two to three (2-3) employees spread icing on a variety of cakes over a workshift, on or about November 6, 1990. D) Finishing Department, Line #2 - Three to four (3-4) employees working along a conveyor decorate various types of cakes using a pastry bag, on or about November 6, 1990. E) Finishing Department, Line #2 - One (1) employee standing along conveyor spread icing of filler over slices of various types of cakes over a workshift, on or about November 6, 1990. The evaluation of these tasks indicate that employees are exposed to a hazard which is causing or likely to cause musculoskeletal disorders. The employer did not implement an effective control strategy to reduce or eliminate such disorders. The injury and illness records for 1989 and 1990, documented a pattern of repetitive motion injuries. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is the implementation of an ergonomics management program consisting of the following four elements: 1) Worksite analysis to recognize and identify existing cumulative trauma disorders in the workplace. This analysis should include development and use of ergonomic checklist and employee questionnaire. Periodic surveys of the worksite shall be conducted at least annually to evaluate work practices and engineering controls. Employee participation in the ergonomic program should be encourged. 2) Medical management which includes accurate recordkeeping of CTDs. the program should address early recognition, evaluation, and referral of CTD cases, should include conservative treatment and conservative return to work. Systematic worksite review by the medical team should also be included in the program. 3) Training and education for exposed employees, including methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Retraining should be done annually, or as operations change. Training should address hazards associated with the job, the risks of developing CTDs, symptoms of exposure and how to prevent the occurrence of CTD. A supervisors' training program should also be implemented to allow recognition of the signs of CTDs and to reinforce the employer's ergonomic program. 4) Hazard prevention and control which includes engineering, work practices, and administrative controls, and personal protective equipment were relevant. A) Administrative controls are implemented which reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of exposure to ergonomic stress. These controls may include job rotation, reduction of repetitions, and preventative maintenance of related equipment. Personal protective equipment shall be evaluated to determine any contribution to ergonomic stress. B) Work pratice controls are implemented which included proper work techniques, new employee conditioning, and monitoring and modifications as necessary to minimize ergonomic stressors. Examples of work practice controls applicable to this workplace include: 1) All icing or filler to be used should be allowed to reach room temperature prior to use to make it easier to spread or squeeze through the pastry bags. 2) Require workers to participate in a fitness and exercise program by providing time for flexibility and warmup before beginning work, and have stretch/exercise periods at mid-morning and mid-afternoon of the workday. C) Engineering controls are designed by a qualified ergonomist and may include work station redesign, tool and handle redesign, and change of work methods. The goal of this program should be to make the job fit the person. Examples of engineering controls applicable to this workplace include: 1) On both lines, employees icing or spreading filler should exchange their metal spatulas for a modified rectangular masonry trowel, type spatula. the larger handle and positioning of the handle over the center of the spreading surface should reduce the amount of force required to spread the icing or filler. 2) The company should work on developing a tool that would replace the pastry bags used to decorate the cakes. The tool would be some sort of pneumatic or electrical decorating guns. Our research indicates that such a device does not exist in the marketplace at this time. STEP 1- Implementation of an ergonomics program for worksite analysis, medical management, and training and education, as detailed in Items 1-3 above. STEP 2- Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement, outlining a schedule for the implementation of the administrative, work practice and engineering controls as detailed in Items 4(a) - 4(c). All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by a person trained in the evaluation of workplace conditions which cause cumulative trauma disorders. Ninety (90) day progress reports are required during the abatement period. STEP 3- Implementation of administrative, work practices and engineering controls, as described in Items 4(a) - 4(c), above.
Recent events (2)
- — P (S) $360.00
- — Z (S) $360.00
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $240 · Current $240
1910.106 D02 I
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $240 · Current $240
1910.106 E02 IIB
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $240 · Current $240
1910.106 E02 IVD
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $240 · Current $240
1910.106 E06 II
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $240 · Current $240
1910.106 E07 IB
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
Recent events (2)
- — P (S) $300.00
- — Z (S) $300.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $360 · Current $360
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $120 · Current $120
1910.305 J02 II
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $420 · Current $420
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1910.1200 H02 II
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 1991
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1910.1200 H02 III
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 1991
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 1991
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Jan 9, 1991
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 1991
More inspections at Sweet Street Desserts, Incorporated
View Sweet Street Desserts, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 102597168.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.