Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: RAMSEY WINDOW CLEANING COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RAMSEY WINDOW CLEANING COMPANY in 650 N. 12TH STREET, SHAFFER ORECCHIA ASSOCIATION, LEMOYNE, PA 17043 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 102697729.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ramsey Window Cleaning Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ramsey Window Cleaning Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
650 N. 12TH STREET, SHAFFER ORECCHIA ASSOCIATION
City
LEMOYNE
State
PA
ZIP
17043
Mailing
650 MOHN STREET, STEELTON, PA 17113
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
7349
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Construction safety.

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 1992
Abate by
Dec 5, 1992
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $450 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were
exposed to multiple injuries from a fall:
THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS BELOW (1a AND 1b) HAVE BEEN GROUPED BECAUSE
THEY INVOLVE SIMILAR OR RELATED HAZARDS THAT MAY INCREASE THE
POTENTIAL
FOR INJURY AND/OR ILLNESS.
(a)  Window Cleaning  Site, 650 North 12th Street, Lemoyne
Two (2) employees were observed cleaning windows at the
edge of a flat  roof  with  no fall protection provided
exposing them to  a  24  foot  fall hazard, on or about
August 12, 1992.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to provide and wear safety belts and lanyard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $450.00
  • · Z (S) $750.00

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 1992
Abate by
Dec 8, 1992

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 1992
Abate by
Dec 5, 1992
Penalty
Initial $750 · Current $450 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were
exposed to multiple injuries from a fall:
(a)  Window Cleaning Site, 650 North 12th Street, Lemoyne
Employee was  using  a  sky genie to clean windows and
not utilizing a separate  independent fall arrest
system,
inclusive of a safety  belt,  rope  grap lifeline
with anchorage exposing the employee to  a  maximum 50
foot fall hazard, on or about August 12, 1992.
(b)  Window Cleaning Site, 650 North 12th Street, Lemoyne
Employee was  using  a  sky genie to clean windows and
the two (2) nylon ropes being used were not capable of
sustaining  a  minimum  tensile  load  of 5,000 pounds
exposing the employee to  a  maximum  of  50 foot fall
hazard, on or about August 12, 1992.
(c)  Window Cleaning Site, 650 North 12th Street, Lemoyne
Employee was  using  a  sky genie to clean windows and
the ropes were not effectively padded where they
contacted
to edge of the roof, exposing the employee to a
maximum of 50 foot fall hazard, on or about August 12,
1992.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to:
1.  Training employees in the use of the equipment before it
is used;
2.  Inspection of equipment each day before use;
3.  Proper rigging, including sound anchorages and tiebacks,
in all cases, with particular emphasis on providing
tiebacks when counterweights, cornice hooks, or similar
non-permanent anchorage systems are used;
4.  Use of a separate fall arrest system (including bodybelt,
sit harness, or full body harness, rope grap or similar
device; lifeline; and anchorage (all of which are
completely
independent of the friction device and its
support system)), so that any failure in a friction
device, support seat (or Harness), support line, or
anchorage system will not affect the ability of the fall
arrest system to operate and quickly stop the employee's
fall;
5.  All lines installed (such as by using knots, swages or
eye splices) when rigging descent control devices shall
be capable of sustaining a minimum tensile load of 5,000
pounds;
6.  Provisions are made for rescue;
7.  Ropes are effectively padded where they contact edges
of the building, anchorage, obstructions, or other
surfaces which might cut or weaken the rope;
8.  Provisions are made for intermittent stabilization for
descent in excess of 130 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $450.00
  • · Z (S) $750.00

1926.59 E01

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 1992
Abate by
Jan 15, 1993
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O)
  • · Z (O)

1926.59 G01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 1992
Abate by
Dec 8, 1992

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 102697729.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.