Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CHURCHILL CORPORATION

Follow-up inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a follow-up safety inspection of CHURCHILL CORPORATION in 344 FRANKLIN STREET, MELROSE, MA 02176 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 102916244.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Churchill Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Churchill Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
344 FRANKLIN STREET
City
MELROSE
State
MA
ZIP
02176
Mailing
P.O. BOX G, MELROSE, MA 02176
Inspection type
Follow-up (F)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Data loaded
NAICS code
000000
SIC code (legacy)
3444
Employees
25
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Repeat 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 20, 1988
Abate by
Nov 21, 1988
Penalty
Initial $280 · Current $196 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to
hazards of having part of their body caught between the moving elevator
and the hoistway.
A feasible and useful method to correct this hazard, among other methods
is the installation of elevator car doors or gates that would prevent
employees from having any part of their body outside the periphery of
the elevator car unless the elevator car is within the landing zone and
that were electrically interlocked to prevent the elevator car from
moving unless the elevator car doors or gates are in the closed
position:
a) Shipping/receiving department: The F.S. Payne elevator car had been
modified, but did not include an electrically interlocked car gate.
The Churchill Corp. was previously cited for a violation of the
Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard
section (5)(a)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection number
101833325, citation number 1, item number 1a, issued on 7/30/86.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (R) $196.00
  • — I (R) $196.00
  • — Z (R) $280.00

5(a)(1)

Repeat 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 20, 1988
Abate by
Nov 21, 1988
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were
free from recognized hazards that wee causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to
hazards of falling down the hoistway shaft when the elevator car was not
in the landing zone, being struck by the elevator car when the car was
entering or leaving the landing zone or having part of their body caught
between the moving elevator and the hoistway.
A feasible and useful method to correct this hazard, among other methods
is to provide elevator hoistway or landing with doors or gates to
prevent employees from having any part of their body within the hoistway
shaft, outside the periphery of the landing, unless the elevator is
within the landing and that were electriclaly interlocked to prevent the
elevator car from moving when the hoistway or landing doors or gates are
in the open position and so latched that the doors or gates cannot be
opened from the landing side unless the elevator car is within the
landing:
a) Shipping/Receiving department: The F.S. Payne Elevator's landing
gates had been modified, but did not include electro-mechanical
interlocks.
The Churchhill Corp. was previously cited for a violation of this
Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard
section (5)(A)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection number
101833325, citation number 1, item number 1b, issued on 7/30/86.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (R)
  • — I (R)
  • — Z (R)

1910.212 A03 II

Repeat 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 20, 1988
Abate by
Jun 20, 1988
Penalty
Initial $140 · Current $98 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $98.00
  • — Z (R) $140.00

1910.217 C01 I

Repeat 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 20, 1988
Abate by
Jun 20, 1988
Penalty
Initial $280 · Current $196 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $196.00
  • — Z (R) $280.00

1910.217 B07 IX

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 20, 1988
Abate by
Jun 20, 1988

View Churchill Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 102916244.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.